Author of Report on Google Search Manipulation Corrects Hillary Clinton After Her False Tweet Slamming the President

Spread the love

Author of Report on Google Search Manipulation Corrects Hillary Clinton After Her False Tweet Slamming the President

Avatar

by Cassandra Fairbanks August 20, 2019 222 Comments

After President Donald Trump took to Twitter to share information from a report that found Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election, the former First Lady took to Twitter — with lies that have now been brutally debunked.

The failed presidential candidate took issue with Trump’s tweet about the report, though the report was written by one of her fans.

Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought! @JudicialWatch

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2019

In response, Clinton claimed that “the debunked study you’re referring to was based on 21 undecided voters. For context that’s about half the number of people associated with your campaign who have been indicted.”

However, the study was not debunked and was not based on 21 undecided voters, at all.

The debunked study you’re referring to was based on 21 undecided voters. For context that’s about half the number of people associated with your campaign who have been indicted. https://t.co/0zHnWvGjSv

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 19, 2019

The author of the report, Dr. Robert Epstein, responded to Clinton on Twitter with some facts that she may find inconvenient for her narrative.

“I’m a big #Hillary supporter, BUT… my 2016 monitoring findings were based on an analysis of 13,207 election-related searches, along with the 98,044 web pages to which the search results linked. The pro-Hillary bias was significant at the .001 level,” Dr. Epstein responded, along with a link to his report.

I’m a big #Hillary supporter, BUT… my 2016 monitoring findings were based on an analysis of 13,207 election-related searches, along with the 98,044 web pages to which the search results linked. The pro-Hillary bias was significant at the .001 level. See https://t.co/EQc8vanmJ0

— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019

Epstein didn’t stop there, he also wrote that though he’s a fan and hates correcting her, “to my knowledge no credible authority has ever ‘debunked’ either my 2016 and 2018 election monitoring projects or my controlled studies on internet influence.”

Also, sorry #Hillary (I’m a fan, so I really hate correcting you), BUT… to my knowledge no credible authority has ever “debunked” either my 2016 and 2018 election monitoring projects or my controlled studies on internet influence. See https://t.co/77dW74wlFY

— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019

Also, when the CEO of #Google testified before Congress in Dec. 2018 that “we take issue with Epstein’s methodology,” that was hardly a “debunking.” Monitoring systems are our only true protection against Big Tech. Please see: https://t.co/1eyxrUuFeB

— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019

Epstein even tweeted out a photo of him and Clinton, and wrote about his disappointment in her “blatant lies.”

.@HillaryClinton, whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about me today. As a result, I have been subjected to widespread condemnation by mainstream media. I’m going to fight this. Stay tuned tomorrow for my first-ever twitter storm. pic.twitter.com/CrPHMycVBu

— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *