Category Archives: Save America NOW

Judge Truncale went out of his way to decline to "take judicial notice" of Brook Jackson’s Dec. 14, 2020 letter to DoD.

Bailiwick News

Judge Truncale went out of his way to decline to “take judicial notice” of Brook Jackson’s Dec. 14, 2020 letter to DoD.

Also new videos.

KATHERINE WATT APR 10, 2023

Orientation for new readers. Reconstitution starter pack.


New videos:


Re: USDJ Michael Truncale’s March 31, 2023 order dismissing whistleblower Brook Jackson’s False Claims Act case against Pfizer, Ventavia and ICON.

For background:

I’ve been reading Truncale’s order, thinking about it, taking notes, tracking down citations, re-reading other case documents, and updating my files on six other federal cases that — with Jackson v. Pfizer — I think are the most useful cases for understanding the role of criminal judges embedded in American federal courts, and the pseudo-legal mechanisms through which they operate.

Like their historic counterparts in Hitler’s Germany, Mussolini’s Italy, Stalin’s Russia and many other mass murdering police-states, American federal judges have played a key role in maintaining and expanding the supranational covert biowarfare program run through the Trump/Azar-Biden/Becerra police-state apparatus since January 2020.

The six other cases include South Bay Pentecostal Church v. Newsom (USDC Southern California, 20-cv-00865-BAS-AHG); Butler v. Wolf (USDC Western Pennsylvania, 2:20-cv-677-WSS); Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital System (USDC Southern Texas, 4:21-CV-01774-LNH); Robert v. Austin (USDC Colorado, No. 21-cv-02228-RM-STV); Griner v. Biden (USDC Utah, 2:22-CV-149 DAK-DBP) and Ealy v. Redfield (USDC Oregon, 2:22-cv-00356-HZ)

There’s a lot to unpack.

While I work through the material, one interesting section in Truncale’s order goes to the “Who knew what, and when did they know it?” question.

He addresses that question at pp. 33-34:

Payment despite knowledge: Whose Knowledge Matters?

A threshold issue that this Court must address is whether the FDA’s knowledge or the DoD’s knowledge matters when deciding how much weight to give to the Government’s decision to continue purchasing Pfizer’s vaccine.

The FDA has known of Ms. Jackson’s allegations since September 2020, months prior to Pfizer submitting its first invoice to the DoD in December 2020. [Dkt. 17 at 69; Dkt. 37-2 at 2].

But the DoD, not the FDA, is the entity that originally purchased Pfizer’s vaccine. [Dkt. 17-1 at 303].

The well-pleaded facts require drawing the inference that the DoD did not have knowledge of the alleged fraud prior to February 22, 2022 , approximately two years after it paid Pfizer’s first invoice. [FN 20]


NOTES:

Feb. 22, 2022 was the date Jackson filed her amended complaint.

She filed her original complaint on Jan. 8, 2021.

But after a year of silent inaction by DOJ and Judge Truncale, and Truncale’s gag order on Jackson, the Department of Justice notified Truncale on Jan. 18, 2022 that DOJ had no intention of pursuing Jackson’s case.

Jackson then had to choose between quitting and hiring a private attorney to re-file.

She hired a private attorney and re-filed.

Because Brook Jackson is an extraordinarily courageous, determined woman.


Judge Truncale at March 31, 2023 order, Footnote 20, pp. 33-34:

FN20 – The Amended Complaint, which Ms. Jackson filed on February 22, 2022, pleads that Ms. Jackson had previously provided the DoD with the information that serves as the basis for her allegations. [Dkt. 17 at 15–16].

Defendants [Pfizer] ask the Court to take judicial notice of several documents, including a letter from Ms. Jackson’s former counsel dated December 14, 2020, notifying the DoD about her allegations… [Dkt. 37 at 20–21].

Defendants note that courts routinely take judicial notice of facts published on a party’s own website and contend that it is appropriate for this Court to do so here. Id. at 21 n.19.

These documents do not currently appear on Ms. Jackson’s website. While these documents could potentially be introduced through a motion for summary judgment or at trial, they are not properly before the Court at this time.

Accordingly, the Court declines to take judicial notice of these documents.


In thinking through Truncale’s question — whose knowledge matters? — set aside (for now) that his premise of separate knowledge bases is false.

DoD and HHS, including FDA, are demonstrably two federal agencies jointly engaged in a covert, dual-use biomedical/biowarfare operation with several other administrative agencies. Their executive secretaries and other high-level administrators share knowledge about the program through coordinating committees including the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise.

Setting that aside, Relator Brook Jackson stated in her original complaint (Jan. 8, 2021) and amended complaint (Feb. 22, 2022) that she had “provided this information to the United States and DoD prior to filing a complaint by serving a voluntary pre-filing disclosure statement.”

Then in Pfizer’s April 22, 2022 Motion to Dismiss, Pfizer cited Jackson’s website as the source of Jackson’s Dec. 14, 2020 notice to DoD that they wanted Judge Truncale to judicially notice, and attached a copy of the letter as Exhibit E [Dkt 37-5 at 2-9].

Pfizer thereby entered the document into the public court record independent of Jackson’s website and her own two sworn statements about having made “pre-filing disclosure” to DoD.

Nonetheless, Truncale declined to take “judicial notice.”

Why?

To protect the DoD from legal attribution of knowledge of the clinical trial fraud in December 2020, a time when DoD withdrawal from and cancellation of the purchasing and distribution contracts could have saved the lives of the people targeted with the bioweapons.

On Dec. 14, 2020, through Gregory Shilling, the Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the South West Region, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, DoD was notified that Pfizer, Ventavia and ICON were endangering, sickening and killing human recipients of products which the contractors were using on human beings under the terms of DoD military weapons contracts.

Dec. 14, 2020 was three days after the Marion Gruber-led FDA panel’s sham EUA decision on Dec. 11, 2020.

It was the same day the first victims — outside the 44,000 people targeted through the fraudulent “clinical trials” — were attacked with the Pfizer-labeled DoD bioweapons.

Truncale has got DoD’s back.

Having carefully placed his blinders on by refusing to take judicial notice of the Dec. 14, 2020 letter Jackson sent to the DoD, Truncale concluded:

“…even if the DoD was concerned about potential regulatory or protocol violations, the Project Agreement [Truncale’s false conflation of Base Agreement 2020-532, which has been made public in redacted form, with Project Agreement 2011-003, which has not yet been made public] did not authorize the DoD to decide whether the vaccines were fit for purchase.

Instead, the [Base Agreement] vested this decision-making authority in the FDA.

Thus, what matters when evaluating the Government’s continued purchase of the vaccine is that the FDA granted authorization despite its knowledge of Ms. Jackson’s allegations…


Bottom line: Judge Truncale has now added his own criminal federal judicial review to the sequence that includes:

  • Criminal ‘vaccine’ development and production contracts, which are actually contracts for the development and production of injectable bioweapons.

  • Criminal ‘vaccine’ clinical trial safety records, which are actually records of bioweapon potency results for mRNA and DNA classes of injectable bioweapons.

  • Criminal ‘vaccine’ regulatory review, authorization, manufacturing compliance and safety monitoring records, which are actually theatrical props intended to block public knowledge that the products mislabeled as ‘vaccines,’ transported across state lines, and injected into military targets, are intentionally-lethal bioweapons.


See also:




Subscribe to Bailiwick News

By Katherine Watt  ·  Hundreds of paid subscribers

Gen-X Catholic writing about Covid-times law, geopolitics, philosophy and theology.

TiLTNews Network

Coming Soon to a Country Near You: The EU Commission Wants To Abolish Passports in Exchange for Biometric Border Controls

Passports and identity cards are to become completely digital in the EU, and border controls are to be carried out using biometric recognition processes.

LIONESS OF JUDAH MINISTRY

APR 10, 2023

Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

By Stefan Krempl April 6, 2023

Passports and identity cards will be abolished according to the ideas of the EU Commission.

Instead, there should only be digital documents. At the latest since the Corona pandemic, citizens would expect "the use of contactless technologies as a basic requirement for safe and smooth travel," writes the EU Commission. She wants to "strengthen security regulations with a view to a safer Schengen area", simplify travel "and thus increase the attractiveness of the EU".

"The exclusive use of physical documents makes efficient border crossing controls difficult, and issuing such documents in remote locations can pose problems, ultimately hampering international travel," reads a document that was the basis of a public consultation on the impact assessment in the autumn. "The use of biometric solutions" should enable "the authorities responsible for screening" and border controls to "determine the identity of travelers more reliably and at the same time reduce the risk associated with individual travelers". Of the 360 ​​opinions on the impact assessment, almost all were negative.

Public consultation is already ongoing

Despite this, the Commission is going ahead and is now consulting several variants of the "Digital Travel Credentials" (DTC). Until June 28, anyone can give the EU Commission their opinion on digital travel documents via a questionnaire. As an option, the authority is proposing an EU regulation that would oblige the member states to implement the planned DTC standard of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

Citizens should then be able to cross borders without conventional e-gates or control booths. In return, a "comprehensive comparison of biometric data" is carried out. For this purpose, the EU has been building a biometric super database for all IT systems in the security sector for several years. A legislative proposal is to be made in the third quarter of 2023.

Over 300 critical voices in the autumn impact assessment

In the autumn impact assessment, there were 360 ​​opinions – almost all negative. For example, Sweden’s National Health Federation, which campaigns for natural medicine, severely criticized the project when it was explored in the fall: It was only the EU governments "that felt the need to monitor people’s health" and vaccinations that had been carried out. This is "an unhealthy approach" that destroys the idea that everyone with a passport or ID card can travel freely. In addition, the person who is carrying a travel document in their mobile phone can be tracked using the GPS function. This alone represents "a major threat to privacy".

Other participants also see the right to informational self-determination at risk. If the data from ID cards could be queried without contact, you would quickly lose control. Digital travel documents are insecure and reduce people to biological features such as fingerprints, face, and iris. With appropriate scans, artificial intelligence (AI) gets too much power, although it shouldn’t actually make such decisions.

Source: heise.de

TiLTNews Network

Steve Bannon on How 2008 Planted the Seed for the Trump Presidency

2008 AUG. 10, 2018 By Noah Kulwin

Steve Bannon. Photo: Mark Peterson/Redux

A decade now after the 2008 financial crisis, the cultural and psychological imprint that it left looks almost as deep as the one that followed the Great Depression. Its legacy includes a new radical politics on both the left and the right; epidemics of opioid abuse, suicides, and low birthrates; and widespread resentment, racial and gendered and otherwise, by those who felt especially left behind. This week, New York continues our retrospective on the crash and its aftermath by publishing interviews with some of those who were closest to the events. Here, Steve Bannon, a former Goldman Sachs investment banker turned face of Trump-era populism, on how the bailouts led directly to the 2016 election, why we need to break up the banks, and his goal to turn the GOP into a worker-based party.

I was hoping we could talk about the legacy of the financial crisis. How would you characterize it?
The legacy of the financial crisis: Donald Trump. The legacy of the financial crisis is Donald J. Trump. And I can give you the specific moment: When they put Lehman in bankruptcy, and the geniuses didn’t understand that it was inextricably linked to the commercial paper market. Hank Paulson, Treasury secretary, and Ben Bernanke, the head of the Federal Reserve, they went to see Bush three days later. They told him, ‘We need a trillion dollars in cash, and we need it by five o’clock.’”

And in a profile of courage, President Bush says, “Not my problem. You gotta go to Capitol Hill.” They go up to Capitol Hill, they put everybody in a room. They make them all put their BlackBerrys outside, and they walk in, and Bernanke, who’s not an alarmist, says, “If we don’t have a trillion dollars by today, the American financial system will melt down in 72 hours. The world financial system will melt down in two weeks, and there will be global anarchy.”

And by the way, this was completely brought on by the elites of the country and Wall Street. When I got to Harvard Business School in 1983, a bunch of professors were coming up with a radical idea that’s had a horrible negative consequence on this country and to the fabric of our society: the maximization of shareholder value; this was preached as High Church theology. The whole thing of the financialization of Wall Street, of looking at people as pure commodities and of outsourcing and globalization, came from the business schools and the financial community that had these radical ideas, and nobody kept them in check.

Go back and look at the postwar period. These companies had profit margins, and they traded on Wall Street, but there wasn’t this maniacal focus on the financialization. Companies forgot about the social fabric, forgot about your workers. Everything became commoditized. That led to the financial crisis of 2008. It all came home to roost.

From the long-term credit crisis in the late ’90s, to the implosion of the stock market in 2000 on the internet, to then the financial crisis — every couple years we’re having another financial crisis. And they’re building in intensity. The one in 2008 was three orders of magnitude worse than the crash of 1929.

So write down, the match got lit that led to November 9th at 2:30 in the morning when Donald Trump was named president of the United States.

What does the impact of the financial crisis look like for the American people?
I think you’re starting to see it. I think you’re starting to see the deindustrialization of the country. We stopped investing in the country. Domestic investment’s all going over to China. We deindustrialized Western Europe. Brexit and 2016 are inextricably linked, okay?

Workers know this. It’s the labor vote in the midland counties that drove Brexit. This is what’s so obvious the Democratic Party misses. Donald Trump’s president because of working-class Democrats. The Trump movement is made up of people like my father, the Marty Bannons. My whole household was working-class Democrats. These are adamant Trump supporters because they understand Trump supports working-class people.

Here’s the outrage about it: The balance sheet of the Federal Reserve in September 2008 is about $1 trillion. The balance sheet the day Donald Trump raises his hand, after eight years of the most progressive Democrat in recorded history, is $4.5 trillion. The elites save themselves. They just created money. They flooded the zone with liquidity. If you’re an asset holder, if you owned real estate, stocks, or intellectual property, if you’re an owner, you had the best run in human history, okay?

If you’re a deplorable, you got fucked. You know why the deplorables are angry? They’re rational human beings. We took away the risk for the wealthy. Look, you have socialism in this country for the very wealthy and for the very poor. And you have a brutal form of Darwinian capitalism for everybody else. You’re one paycheck away from oblivion. Do you think the founders of this country, you think that’s what they wanted to have in the 21st century? Dude, this is fucked up.

Here’s what it should have been. We go into Goldman Sachs, everybody, every partner, every guy — zero. You’re wiped out. Just like we’d do any deal at Goldman Sachs. I wipe out all the equity. I’m getting rid of Lloyd Blankfein and Gary Cohn. But the guys that follow them, they can make beaucoup dollar after my money’s paid back and the company’s successful, just like every transaction we do. You should have done that across corporate America and every bank.

Of all the criminal referrals that came out of the thing, where are the fucking guilty? Where’s the accountability of the 200 criminal referrals made by Eric Holder’s Justice Department? Now Holder works for Covington & Burling. The biggest white-collar criminals, they’re all Burling clients. It’s a scam. It’s a total scam.

You know why the deplorables are pissed off? Because they understand it’s a scam. The burden is on their shoulders. We’re deplorables, the Bannons. There ain’t nothing special about the Bannons. We’re just a bunch of fucking hardheaded Micks. All blue-collar company guys, firemen, shit like that. We’re just average people and they love Donald Trump. You know why? He’s the first guy to tell the Establishment to go fuck themselves. And we’re just in the beginning stages, and that’s why right-wing populism’s gonna win, because the left wing, you’re a bunch of pussies.

The Democratic Party is owned and paid for by Wall Street. And here’s a great thing. You would think that after being 16 points down with 88 days to go, and having billions of dollars in cash, and Trump having nothing that to lose — you’d think there’d finally be some accountability. But no, no. It had to be Russia. Had to be Russia.

Going back before the crisis, given that you had worked at Goldman Sachs —
Goldman Sachs changed. When I worked there, it was a private partnership. You had partners who understood that they had joint and several liability when they did the underwriting. And it was a place of tremendous middle-class values and tremendous work ethic. The partnership was predominantly Jewish, and these are the best guys in the world. They were absolutely about the client and about the people that bought the security. The term was “long-term greedy.” It’s not any one deal that makes things; it’s the reputation of the firm. After the Blankfeins and the Cohns and those guys came and started to run it, it became a totally different firm.

The dynamic that you’re describing more broadly sort of happened to all of Wall Street.
Yes. I think it started in the ’90s, and a lot of it came out of the business schools. It became a set of numbers and mathematics. It led to the financialization and the securitization of everything. All value had to go back to the equity-holders. The employees didn’t matter; the communities didn’t matter. Nothing mattered. That’s not the capitalism this country is based upon.

The financial collapse talked about the rot at the heart of the system. And they all made it Bernie Madoff. Fuck Bernie Madoff, Bernie Madoff’s irrelevant. You have bad guys that scam people all the time in history. It’s always gonna happen. Bernie Madoff’s a little nothingburger.

I’m talking about systemic rot. I’m talking about the people that during that financial crisis, the banks that looked the other way, the law firms that looked the other way, the accounting firms that looked the other way. The elite that looked the other way. The business media that looked the other way. They, everybody looked the other way. They’re still kind of looking the other way today. They’re living in the Hamptons and they don’t want to rock the boat on the system. The system’s too big, too complicated, so they just go along.

What was the moment when it sunk in for you that the crisis had hit?
My dad worked at AT&T, the phone company, for 50 years. AT&T is like the Catholic church, okay? It is a permanent part of your life. My dad would tell stories about his father owning one share of stock, and that’s the thing that they would borrow against to get Christmas gifts with that. The concept of selling stock is not in his vernacular. He’s still living — he’s 96 today — and the crisis was, what, ten years ago? So he was 86 years old.

Jim Cramer went on national TV and had a meltdown. He says, “If you need any cash to pay for anything in your life, sell everything you have. Sell everything you have.” I mean, they had to throw a net over him. My dad is sitting there, and he blows. He sold his stock. That was when it hit me personally.

By the way, I would have told him not to sell it.

Would you say the financial crisis and the recession had a greater impact on the country than 9/11?
Yes, absolutely. I don’t think there’s any comparison. And by the way, you don’t know that from reading the press, because the opposition-party media is bought and paid for by the advertisers and all the stuff in the financial community. People don’t know today there’s no criminal referrals, that nobody went to jail about that. Nobody’s been held accountable for that.

Obama came in and had the stimulus, almost a trillion dollars, and nobody knows where the money went. Where’s all the value-added jobs? Where are my hospitals? You know, Robert Moses built shit. We spent a trillion dollars — did we just repave everything? I mean, seriously, it’s a trillion dollars. Where’s all our great shit? It looks like the same place it was ten years ago. It’s worse than Afghanistan as far as the use of proceeds.

Where do you say it went?
I think it went to bail out the wealthy. I think it went into this stock-repurchasing thing, I think it went into supporting real estate and things like that.

There’s a direct correlation between the factories that left, the billets and jobs that left with them, and the opioid crisis. This is what the Democrats miss: Tariffs are more than economics, it’s about dignity and self-worth. You’ve got to get those jobs back. These guys said they’re not coming back. I go, “Is that a law of physics?” You treat this like the second fucking law of thermodynamics. The jobs get shipped over there for financial reasons, we can bring them back. Those jobs can come back, and they’re going to come back. You’re seeing them already coming back today. Now we’re telling guys, “You can build your factory here, or we’re going to throw big tariffs on you.”

It’s about using your leverage to browbeat people, and Donald Trump has got a big enough set of balls to do it. So I don’t want to hear all this yammering, particularly on the left, all these guys yammering about the tariffs. Fuck you. This time, we’ve got to bring things back.

Here’s the concept of right-wing populism. If the ’80s and the way we got in this debacle was this radical idea of maximization of shareholder value, here’s what right-wing populism stands for. It’s very simple concept. We’re going to maximize the value of citizenship. We’re going to maximize citizenship value. If you’re an American citizen, you get a special deal. I don’t care if you’re Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, black, white, red, pink, green. I do not care. If you’re an American citizen, you get a better deal.

Here’s how many H-1B visas I want: none. Until we get Baltimore, Detroit, and St. Louis with, you know, youth unemployment down to zero, and people making high value-added jobs, I don’t need any foreigners. And I’m not a racist. What I want is our citizens to get the jobs. Right now illegal immigration is used as nothing more than a scam to suppress workers’ wages.

All the economic textbooks you’ve got before 2008? Throw them out. They’re totally irrelevant.

Your generation, the readers of New York Magazine, you’re nothing but 18th-century Russian serfs. You’re better fed, and you’re better dressed, and you’re better educated. But you don’t own anything. And you’re not going to own anything.

The state capitalism of the big technology companies has taken away your digital, your data sovereignty. They’ve totally taken it away. You generate intellectual property all day long, and they don’t pay you for it. They take it for free, they monetize at huge margins.

But what right-wing populism does is break that. You agree with that?

There are parts of it that are not exclusive to right-wing populism —
But on the left, your problem is that identity politics is stronger than your populism, and that’s why you can’t lift out of it. You can’t be a populist and buy into the globalist system — and the globalist system is open borders. It’s the Kochs. It’s Wall Street. The Kochs are the biggest open-borders guys in the world. The libertarian Cato Institute, look how radical they are. Cato hates my guts much more than the left.

In 2013, I sit there with Jeff Sessions at the Breitbart Embassy, and we’re looking at the 2012 election. A lawyer named Sean Trende did a three-part analysis of the working class on RealClearPolitics. About how the working class did not come out to vote for Romney. And I told Sessions, I said, “That’s the path to victory right there.” So I tried to talk Jeff Beauregard Sessions into running for president of the United States. I said, “The whole purpose of this campaign is, we’re going to make immigration No. 1 and trade No. 2.” I said, “Trade and immigration are just two sides of the same coin.” And Sessions bought in. Sessions goes, “We’re gonna do it, it’s absolutely brilliant, and we can do it. But I’m not the guy. Our guy will come along.”

I saw early on in 2013 that Dave Bossie started putting on these cattle calls. Little, mini cattle calls in New Hampshire and Iowa. And I noticed Donald J. Trump would get up there, and they had everybody. I’d sit in the back, and I looked at the audience. These are all activists at this time, but they’re principally working class and lower-middle class.

And this is in New Hampshire?
All over. I went to New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina. And May of 2014 was when it hit me. I’m sitting in New Hampshire, I think it’s Hanover, New Hampshire. And I notice that Trump gets an amazing response, and he’s just laying bombs on trade, on China, stuff other guys aren’t talking about. They’re talking happy talk. But it’s that political vernacular. But these guys are all loved, these guys are rock stars in the Republican Party.

Do you think that this was something that Trump believed, or just like a current that he picked up on and chose to run with it at that moment?
He was listening to Lou Dobbs. I tell people, “You wanna know what Trump’s economic policy is? Just get a show of Lou Dobbs from 30 years ago.”

He was talking about immigration ten years ago —
And China 30 years ago. And trade deals. Trump believes this to the marrow of his bones. So I had Trump come over and interviewed him at my little radio show with [Breitbart editor-in-chief] Alex Marlow. Donald Trump had one interview that day, on Sirius XM. Nobody else paid attention.

And then in 2015 he actually announces, and we have, as you described it, this Republican field that decades of donor cultivation has bought.
He goes through them like a scythe through grass.

He’s talking trade deals — and nobody can respond to that. The seminal moment in that is, Ted Cruz goes to Wisconsin and he makes a 30-second spot on a state he’s got to win. He says, “What we need is fair trade deals.” That phrase comes across Ted Cruz’s Heritage Foundation lips, right? “A fair trade deal.” I tell the boys, I said, “We got him.” Now we’re talking fair trade from Ted Fucking Heritage Foundation Cruz. We’re winning.

So trade is picking up. And the Republicans go, “Hang on, that’s High Church Orthodoxy. You can’t.”

And so when you start getting to the general election, where are you at?
It’s very simple. I get announced [as the campaign’s chief executive] in August, okay? He’s down by 16 points, all this stuff. Hillary’s on the beach, in the Hamptons. She was raising money. Because you guys are gonna win. Now you gotta win the House, the Senate, and the Supreme Court. It’s all over. Conservatives are done. You guys basically run America for 100 years. Everybody says Trump’s so far gone that he’s running a mad bomber from Breitbart just to tear his enemies on the way down. They’re not gonna win. Bannon’s never been in a campaign in his life. This Bannon is a bigger attack dog than Trump. He’s going to go out to destroy his enemies. Okay.

She comes off the beach the next week to Reno, for her first big speech. And her speech is Steve Bannon, Breitbart, alt-right, white supremacy, misogynist. I’m sitting there going, Good God, she’s wanting to be the commander-in-chief, the most powerful job in the world, and she’s talking about Breitbart? Are you fucking kidding me? I told the guys right there — I’d already told Trump “You’re gonna win” — I told the whole rest of the staff, “It’s over.” I said, “If she’s going to run this, we got them.” For all their brilliance, they had no earthly idea what the campaign was about.

Then on September 9th, it’s a Sunday this year, the high holy day for the deplorables, is when she gave that speech where she calls these people deplorables. The backbone of the country. Trump understood where the people were in the country. They’re sitting there telling them, Do you think anybody gives a fuck about Breitbart or Steve Bannon or the alt-right?

So then you get to November, and these trends continue and continue, and then Trump narrowly wins.
But remember, part of our platform, one of the things I put in speeches all the time, was, we’re going to break up the banks. We’re going to break Citi up. We’re gonna bifurcate commercial banks from investment banking.

That was your agenda on day one? Well, what happened?
Well, we picked Gary Cohn as the Treasury secretary. They picked Jared Kushner, right? Picked a bunch of progressive lefties who are all stupid. Steve Mnuchin, Gary Cohn, progressive Democrats. You have to understand something, shipmate: Progressive Democrats on Wall Street are not populists. They want to throw you a few bones on social issues, that I think are kind of marginal, to cover the economic issues. Just look at it.

But now McMaster is gone, Cohn is gone, Tillerson’s gone. Look what Trump’s done in six months. He’s reorganized the world’s commercial system. We’re very close to having a massive reorganization in six months. The Wall Street stuff will all come. Trump wants to make sure first, get the economy revved back up again —

What if it doesn’t?
Well, the economy is going to be at 4 percent growth. Wages are going to start to follow. We’ve got time. You can’t do everything at one time. Let’s change the world’s commercial relationships and change the supply chain away from China, okay? First off, that would be Herculean, because for 30 years we looked the other way and exacerbated and we helped its growth.

Trump is a truly transformational president. And you’re seeing it right now.

You’ve got to go for Wall Street hammer and tong. I’m a big believer in Glass-Steagall. I think you’ve gotta go up and break up these money-center banks. I’m a huge believer in the Volcker Rule, right? I think all that stuff can be put back in prop trading. We’re all on the same page. You’ve got to look at the leveraging of things. All of the problems we had pre-2008, the casino mentality’s starting over again. It’s all gotta be stopped. I think right-wing populism’s the only way to do it. The Democratic Party is much more bought and paid for by Wall Street than we are. It just is.

And what happens if the Democrats win the house?
The very first thing they’ll do is impeach him. Yeah.

On the basis of what the Mueller investigation digs up?
Who knows? And who cares? They’ll think of something. It doesn’t matter. There’s not a search for truth. They’ll have the votes. You gotta remember, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Scarborough and Rahm Emanuel — all the smart guys are sitting there going, “It’s not about impeachment. Don’t say impeachment. It’s about your local congressman and making your life better.” Because they’ve seen the same data I’ve seen. The way to get the deplorables out is very simple: It’s talking impeachment. They want to shut you up, and they want to impeach Trump. So if you like Trump, you gotta show up. It’s very simple.

Look, my whole focus in life is very simple: I’m trying to turn the Republican Party into a worker-based party. Because in a worker-based party, you can control the United States of America.

It strikes me that the only reason it’s even feasible to make the Republican Party something that stands for the working man is because ten years ago, a bunch of bankers got bailed out …
Yes, exactly. You’re 100 percent correct. At eleven in the morning on September 18th of 2008, in the Oval Office, when the secretary of Treasury and the chair of the Federal Reserve told the president of the United States, “We need a trillion dollars by 5 p.m.” — boom. That lit a match, and the explosion was Trump.

TiLTNews Network

Trump to rally in Alaska to boost Palin and Murkowski challenger


RSBNetwork.com

Former President Trump will travel to Alaska this weekend to stump for former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s congressional bid and a GOP challenger to Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). The rally is set for Saturday afternoon. Trump will rally for Palin, Governor Mike Dunleavy and Kelly Tshibaka, who is looking to oust Murkowski. Earlier this month,…

Source: Trump to rally in Alaska to boost Palin and Murkowski challenger

TiLTNews Network

AZ State Senator: Info Coming Out On Private Canvass In Arizona

AZ State Senator: Info Coming Out On Private Canvass In Arizona

By

Jacob Palmieri

September 8, 2021

Lawyer for Jan. 6 Defendants Released From Hospital, Says Reports He Went ‘Missing’ Are Inaccurate

Defense Attorney John Pierce speaks during an extradition hearing for Kyle Rittenhouse in Lake County court in Waukegan, Ill., Friday, Oct. 30, 2020. (Nam Y. Huh/AP Photo, Pool)

Defense Attorney John Pierce speaks during an extradition hearing for Kyle Rittenhouse in Lake County court in Waukegan, Ill., Friday, Oct. 30, 2020. (Nam Y. Huh/AP Photo, Pool)

A lawyer representing 17 clients who were allegedly involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol breach released a statement Tuesday saying reports he went missing are false.

John Pierce, who is based in California, issued a lengthy comment to The Gateway Pundit saying he was hospitalized for 12 days and has recovered. Pierce later confirmed to The Epoch Times on Tuesday that he released the statement.

Court filings that were submitted last month by acting U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips said that about 20 cases related to the Jan. 6 incident haven’t proceeded after Pierce didn’t show up, alleging that he was “reportedly ill” with COVID-19 and on a ventilator. A law firm associate who isn’t a licensed lawyer appeared in Pierce’s place during court hearings and proceedings, according to the filings.

“Unfortunately, it seems that Mr. Pierce may be hospitalized and unable to communicate, and it is unclear when Mr. Pierce will recover,” prosecutors wrote in the filing.

Pierce, however, said that he was released from a Los Angeles-area hospital on Sept. 5 after a 12-day stay.

“I was not ‘missing’ or anything of the sort. I am greatly appreciative of the many expressions of prayer and support,” he said in a statement. “And I am deeply grateful for the amazing care I received from the doctors, nurses, and staff who cared for me.”

jan. 6Police release tear gas into a crowd during clashes at the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)

Pierce then said that during his recovery, he will not partake in a full-time schedule until Sept. 13, and that “next week, I expect to be fully operational.”

Based on the statement, it’s not clear why Pierce was hospitalized. However, he stated that “I have not taken any vaccination for COVID-19, nor do I plan to do so.”

A colleague of Pierce’s, Brody Womack, told Business Insider that the lawyer may have been exhausted and dehydrated due to his continual work for his clients. The reports of Pierce’s absence drew some concern from several of his clients, including alleged Proud Boys member Paul Rae.

“Unless I’m being lied to, I’m hearing ‘Don’t be concerned,’” Rae told ABC News. “I don’t know what’s going on.”

Several months ago, Pierce was one of several lawyers who raised the alarm about how dozens of the Jan. 6 defendants were being treated while in a federal jail in the District of Columbia, saying that they were being confined 23 hours per day, had a lack of medical care, and had restricted access to their legal counsel.

Pierce told Epoch TV in July that the defendants are being detained by federal judges under the 1984 Bail Reform Act, which authorizes pretrial detention if it’s believed the individuals are a threat to the community or a flight risk.

“There are about 50 plus or minus that are being detained, that have been in prison for months and will likely remain in prison for many more months until their day in court,” Pierce said.

Jack Phillips

Jack Phillips

SENIOR REPORTER

Jack Phillips is a reporter at The Epoch Times based in New York.

TiLTNews Network