Order Here

Activist Post
Help isn’t coming!
We live in a world where most people would rather outsource their survival to some random government agency instead of taking the tough, but necessary steps to ensure their own health and safety. But when disaster strikes, the reality of the situation is you’re on your own. Help isn’t coming.
If you think anyone in the government cares what happens to you, you’re wrong!
In The Ultimate Situational Survival Guide: Self-Reliance Strategies for a Dangerous World, Robert Richardson, author and founder of OffGridSurvival.com, seeks to empower people to take control of their lives, their security, and their personal preparedness. Richardson says, “We live in a world full of dependents; people who have either lost the will, or were never taught what it really takes to be self-reliant.”
Richardson, who has been an emergency preparedness consultant and writer for over a decade, says he wrote the book to help empower people to take control of their lives, and to get people ready for the chaos that he sees coming.

The United States is now over 17 trillion dollars in debt, with all signs pointing towards an economic crisis even worse that what we experienced in 2008. In a nation of 317 Million people, over 109 million of them now live in a household that receives some sort of government welfare.

Richardson warns that the country as at a tipping point.

I think we’re at a point where there’s no longer a way to dig ourselves out of the mess that’s been created by decades of criminal politicians. While most remain willfully ignorant of what’s really going on, the reality of the situation is this country is heading towards not only an economic collapse, but a collapse of society as well.

From an out of control government that cares more about public perception than they do in fixing actual problems, to a checked out public that would rather stand in line for the newest iPhone than take even a single action to help protect themselves from disasters, we are living in an age where self-reliance and preparedness has taken a backseat to just about everything.
The Ultimate Situational Survival Guide is a wakeup to anyone who hasn’t prepared.
This is not another wilderness survival manual, or some government pamphlet on 72-hour survival kits; the book is a step-by-step guide to surviving real-life 21st century threats. From surviving natural disasters, man-made disasters and disease outbreaks, to step-by-step instructions for surviving urban disasters, crime, violence, social unrest and terrorist attacks, readers will learn the self-reliance strategies they need to survive just about any crisis or threat. When disaster hits, do you really want to count on some government agency to protect you and your family?
The Ultimate Situational Survival Guide: Self-Reliance Strategies for a Dangerous World is now available, at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Walmart and other major booksellers.

The Ultimate Situational Survival Guide: Self-Reliance Strategies for a Dangerous World
Activist
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:41:00 GMT

 

Lily Dane
Activist Post

An 8-year-old Long Island girl has been kicked out of school, and the reason is outrageous.
Ceili McNicholas was told not to return to Long Island’s Laddie A. Decker Sound Beach School after her mother Jamie refused to let her receive the T-Dap booster, which protects against tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis.
The decision to skip the booster wasn’t solely Jamie’s idea – her daughter’s pediatrician won’t administer the shot because it is labeled for children ages 10 and over. Ceili is only 8.
“If we give that T-Dap vaccination between 7 and 10, we are using it off label. And it’s not licensed for usage.. So if we can’t use it, then we are the ones going to be held liable,” Long Island pediatrician Dr. Mary Renna told CBS New York.

Jamie said Ceili is among a small percentage of children who got all their vaccinations for pertussis, also known as whooping cough, under the age of 4. The state recently changed their immunization regulations, and now they are requiring a booster shot for those kids.
“I got a call from the school in September saying she needed another vaccine in order to be compliant with this new regulation,” Jamie said.
Doctors interviewed by CBS pointed out a conflict between government agencies: The FDA approves the T-Dap booster for ages 10 and over, but the state follows CDC guidelines, which recommends the booster for ages 7 through 10.

Jamie received a letter from the school that said Ceili would not be allowed to return until she had the booster. Monday, November 17, was her deadline.
“We put her on the bus as usual,” Jamie said. But Ceili was then told her mom would have to pick her up, CBS reported.
“The assistant principal took me to the parking lot and took me to the car,” Ceili said.
The school district said it has no choice and is only enforcing regulations set by the state:

In a statement, the Miller Place School District said “We appreciate the family’s frustration. The Miller Place School District is required and obligated to follow all of the rules and regulations of the State of New York on all matters including children’s health.

Questions and concerns about this issue should be raised with the New York State Department of Education and the Suffolk County Department of Health.”

So, the school district said it is following state education guidelines. The New York State Education Department said it is following the guidelines of state health officials. And … the state Health Department said its decisions are based on CDC recommendations.
Is anyone else confused?
And should we really trust the CDC, anyway?
Jamie said she isn’t giving in:

The only way that she will be back in school before age 10 is if the state makes an exception for my daughter and the other kids that are faced with the same situation, because I’m not getting her that shot.

The manufacturer put a guideline on things for a reason. I don’t feel that because there is no vaccine available, just giving them the ones for the older kids — it’s not the answer.

Jamie has begun to homeschool Ceili and has started an online petition to get her daughter back into school. She said her daughter misses school and her teacher.
“It breaks your heart,” Jamie said. “But do I sacrifice her health, possibly, just to get her into that building?”
Surely there are other students who attend Ceili’s school who are not vaccinated. New York allows two vaccination exemptions:

Section 2164 of the Public Health Law permits the following two exemptions to this mandatory immunization requirement:

(1) If the parent objects to the immunization because the parent holds genuine and sincere religious beliefs which are contrary to the requirement that the child be immunized; or

(2) If a New York State licensed physician certifies that such immunization may be detrimental to the child’s health.

Here are the state’s guidelines for medical exemptions:

If you are seeking a medical exemption, you must provide a letter from a New York State licensed physician certifying that one or more of the required immunizations are detrimental to your child’s health. The letter should specify which immunizations may be harmful to your child and for how long the immunization(s) would be detrimental. Your school will forward documentation in support of a medical exemption to the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene for review.

Perhaps it is time for the parents of impacted children to start exploring those options, or opt to homeschool like Jamie.
Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!”

School Expels Child Over Vaccine That Even the Doctor Refuses to Give
Activist
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:05:00 GMT

---

Ron Paul. Photo by David Carlyon, Wikipedia Commons

1, Opinion, Technology

Ron Paul: Internet Gambling Ban: A Winner For Sheldon Adelson, A Losing Bet For The Rest Of Us – OpEd

November 17, 2014 Ron Paul Leave a comment

By Ron Paul

Most Americans, regardless of ideology, oppose “crony capitalism” or “cronyism.” Cronyism is where politicians write laws aimed at helping their favored business beneficiaries. Despite public opposition to cronyism, politicians still seek to use the legislative process to help special interests.

For example, Congress may soon vote on legislation outlawing Internet gambling. It is an open secret, at least inside the Beltway, that this legislation is being considered as a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, who is perhaps best known for using his enormous wealth to advance a pro-war foreign policy, is now using his political influence to turn his online competitors into criminals.

Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are motivated by a desire to curry favor with a wealthy donor. Instead, they give a number of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some claim that legalizing online gambling will enrich criminals and even terrorists! But criminalizing online casinos will not eliminate the demand for online casinos. Instead, passage of this legislation will likely guarantee that the online gambling market is controlled by criminals. Thus, it is those who support outlawing online gambling who may be aiding criminals and terrorists.

A federal online gambling ban would overturn laws in three states that allow online gambling. It would also end the ongoing debate over legalizing online gambling in many other states. Yet some have claimed that Congress must pass this law in order to protect states rights! Their argument is that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get around those laws by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized.

Even if the argument had merit that allowing states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it would not justify federal legislation on the issue. Nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government given any authority to regulate activities such as online gambling. Arguing that “states rights” justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which was intended to limit federal power, on its head.

Many supporters of an Internet gambling ban sincerely believe that gambling is an immoral and destructive activity that should be outlawed. However, the proposed legislation is not at all about the morality of gambling. It is about whether Americans who do gamble should have the choice to do so online, or be forced to visit brick-and-mortar casinos.

Even if there was some moral distinction between gambling online or in a physical casino, prohibiting behavior that does not involve force or fraud has no place in a free society. It is no more appropriate for gambling opponents to use force to stop people from playing poker online than it would be for me to use force to stop people from reading pro-war, neocon writers.

Giving government new powers over the Internet to prevent online gambling will inevitably threaten all of our liberties. Government bureaucrats will use this new authority to expand their surveillance of the Internet activities of Americans who have no interest in gambling, just as they used the new powers granted by the PATRIOT Act to justify mass surveillance.

The proposed ban on Internet gambling is a blatantly unconstitutional infringement on our liberties that will likely expand the surveillance state. Worst of all, it is all being done for the benefit of one powerful billionaire. Anyone who thinks banning online gambling will not diminish our freedoms while enriching criminals is making a losing bet.

Published by RonPaul Institute.

Ron Paul

Ronald Ernest “Ron” Paul (born August 20, 1935) is an American physician, author, and politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas’s 14th congressional district, which includes Galveston. He was a three-time candidate for President of the United States, as a Libertarian in 1988 and as a Republican in 2008 and 2012.

Source: Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Ron Paul Attacks Sheldon Adelson for Cronyism
Joshua Cook
Thu, 27 Nov 2014 01:50:05 GMT

HAPPY TRACKSGIVING: How all your holiday travels are being monitored http://www.infowars.com/happy-tracksgiving-how-all-your-holiday-travels-are-being-monitored/

Open Letter From Libertarian Party Chair Nicholas Sarwark To Sen. Rand Paul http://www.infowars.com/open-letter-from-libertarian-party-chair-nicholas-sarwark-to-sen-rand-paul/

Report: Congress Can Stop Obama’s Immigration Moves With ‘Power of Purse’ http://www.infowars.com/report-congress-can-stop-obamas-immigration-moves-with-power-of-purse/

Vinyl record sales hit 18-year high… http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2014-11-27/vinyl-record-sales-hit-an-18-year-high

▶ A Thanksgiving Message from Ron Paul – YouTube.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc2ZMllaSdI?feature=player_detailpage]

Intentional Ferguson fires set to get federal disaster dollars http://www.infowars.com/intentional-ferguson-fires-set-to-get-federal-disaster-dollars/

US police trained to occupy communities: Analyst http://www.infowars.com/us-police-trained-to-occupy-communities-analyst/

OBAMA UNLEASHED: MONTH OF DEFIANT FURY… http://www.mcclatchydc.com/201.4/11/26/248268_obama-unleashed-defies-gop-election.html?sp=/99/104/244/106/&rh=1

Missouri Lt. Governor: Obama Ordered National Guard to Stand Down in Ferguson –.

Missouri Lt. Governor: Obama Ordered National Guard to Stand Down in Ferguson

Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder makes stunning claim

National Guard and police failed to protect businesses targeted by rioters during last night’s chaos, leading to charges that the Obama administration issued a stand down order.

Earlier this morning, Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder made the stunning claim, telling Fox News, “Is the reason that the National Guard was not in there because the Obama Administration and the Holder Justice Department leaned on you to keep them out? I cannot imagine any other reason why the governor who mobilized the National Guard would not have them in there to stop this.”

His comments followed Ferguson Mayor James Knowles’ complaint that his request for National Guard assistance was repeatedly ignored by Democrat Governor Jay Nixon last night.

Watch the video above to see Kinder and Knowles’ remarks.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

▶ Exclusive: Real Rick Ross Exposes Gangster Rap – YouTube.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIQ-8qr8VyA?feature=player_detailpage]

 

Melissa Melton
Activist Post
Although the government and mainstream media perfectly timed the Ferguson grand jury decision to go off right after President Obama passed executive amnesty (which, magically, no one in the mainstream media is talking about anymore), it also works out well for the White House that this event transpired right before the upcoming holiday.
Why, you might ask?
Because the Obama administration has prepared, for the fifth time now, to oh-so-quietly release 3,415 brand spanking new regulations right before Thanksgiving while everyone just so happens to be totally distracted and focusing on the orchestrated civil disorder going on in Ferguson.
Via The Daily Caller:

The federal Unified Agenda is the Obama administration’s regulatory road map, and it lays out thousands of regulations being finalized in the coming months. Under President Barack Obama, there has been a tradition of releasing the agenda late on Friday — and right before a major holiday.
“It’s become an unfortunate tradition of this administration and others to drop these regulatory agendas late on a Friday and right before a holiday,” Matt Shudtz, executive director of the Center for Progressive Reform, told The Hill newspaper.

The White House’s regulatory agenda for spring 2014 was released on the eve of the Memorial Day weekend, when millions of people set out on weekend getaways or family vacations.
“It’s unfortunate because it’s an update on protections for Americans of all stripes,” Shudtz told the Hill. “It lays out the administration’s plan and it deserves more attention.”

Nice, right?
Apparently, this release comes new and improved with even more regulations than last time, and it even comes complete with the added bonus of having 189 rules which come with a nice fat price tag of $100 million.
It’s funny… Once upon a time, throwing out an amount like a hundred million would’ve made some people’s eyeballs literally pop out of their heads. I can use the word literally in a figurative sense now without being incorrect, because apparently we live in such an Idiocracy society that the official definition of the word “literally” has been updated to include “used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true.”
… I’m not even kidding.

See?
Anyway, who knows what evil will be lurking in those 3,415 new regulations. No, really. Who knows? Hardly anyone knows, because these regs will be slipped in under cover of concocted protests in Ferguson, a plate full of turkey and stuffing, and a football game.
Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared, and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!

With Everyone Focused on Ferguson, Obama Quietly Passing 3,400 New Regulations Before Thanksgiving
Activist
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:28:00 GMT

Rand Paul: Politicians are to blame for Ferguson http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-politicians-are-to-blame-for-ferguson/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8smzbBzVATo

BREAKING! Ferguson Grand Jury Announces Verdict – YouTube.

▶ MSM Caught Covering Up Ebola Death – YouTube.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbFmhARC5t8]

 

Anthony Freda Art

By Ron Paul
It will not shock readers to hear that quite often legislation on Capitol Hill is not as advertised. When Congress wants to do something particularly objectionable, they tend give it a fine-sounding name. The PATRIOT Act is perhaps the best-known example. The legislation had been drafted well before 9/11 but was going nowhere. Then the 9/11 attacks gave it a new lease on life. Politicians exploited the surge in patriotism following the attack to reintroduce the bill and call it the PATRIOT Act. To oppose it at that time was, by design, to seem unpatriotic.
At the time, 62 Democrats voted against the Act. On the Republican side there were only three no votes: former Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH), former Rep. Butch Otter (R-ID), and myself.
The abuses of the Constitution in the PATRIOT Act do not need to be fully recounted here, but Presidents Bush and Obama both claimed authority based on it to gut the Fourth Amendment. The PATRIOT Act ushered in the era of warrantless wiretapping, monitoring of our Internet behavior, watering down of probable cause, and much more. After the revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, we know how the NSA viewed constitutional restraints on surveillance of American people during the PATRIOT Act period.

After several re-authorizations of the PATRIOT Act, including some cosmetic reforms, Congress last October unveiled the USA FREEDOM Act. This was advertised as the first wholesale PATRIOT Act Reform bill. In fact, the House version was watered down to the point of meaninglessness and the Senate version was not much better. The final straw was the bill’s extension of key elements of the PATRIOT Act until 2017.

Fortunately, last week the USA FREEDOM Act was blocked from further consideration in the US Senate. The procedural vote was significant and important, but it caused some confusion as well. While some well-meaning pro-privacy groups endorsed the FREEDOM Act as a first step to reform, some anti-liberty neoconservatives opposed the legislation because even its anemic reforms were unacceptable. The truth is, Americans should not accept one more extension of the PATRIOT Act and should not endorse its continued dismemberment of our constitutional liberties. If that means some Senators vote with anti-liberty colleagues to kill the extension, we should still consider it a victory.
As the PATRIOT Act first faced a sunset in 2005, I had this to say in the debate over whether it should be re-authorized:
“When Congress passed the Patriot Act in the emotional aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks, a sunset provision was inserted in the bill that causes certain sections to expire at the end of 2005. But this begs the question: If these provisions are critical tools in the fight against terrorism, why revoke them after five years? Conversely, if these provisions violate civil liberties, why is it acceptable to suspend the Constitution for any amount of time?”
Reform is often meant to preserve, not repeal bad legislation. When the public is strongly opposed to a particular policy you will almost never hear politicians say “let’s repeal the law.” It is always a pledge to reform the policy or law. The USA FREEDOM Act was no different.
With the failure of the FREEDOM Act to move ahead in the Senate last week, several of the most egregious sections of the PATRIOT Act are set to sunset next June absent a new authorization. Congress will no doubt be under great pressure to extend these measures. We must do our very best to make sure they are unsuccessful!
You can see more of Dr. Ron Paul’s work at RonPaulInstitute.org where this article first appeared.

Defeat of USA FREEDOM Act is a Victory for Freedom
Activist Post
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:08:00 GMT