Tag Archives: Evil

WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: This New Democrat Bill Defines Pure Evil

 

By Wayne Allyn Root

I’ve tried in my career as a conservative commentator to rarely use the word “evil.” Disagreeing over policies and a political agenda doesn’t make your opponent “evil.” As a matter of fact, most reasonable, commonsense Americans want compromise.

What if I reported my opinion is Democrats have now officially crossed the line into “evil.” I’m sure some of you might say I’m being harsh.

What if I reported Democrats are extreme, radical, Kool-Aid drinking, Stepford Wives trying to destroy America, American exceptionalism, capitalism, the US Constitution and the middle class. Some of you might say “Wayne, now you’re really exaggerating.”

Nope. I’m not.

After you read today’s column, I’m thinking you might say, “Wow, for once you were actually being subtle Wayne. You’re being far too nice in describing what today’s Democrat Party has become.”

It’s that bad.

I’m now going to play the role of Paul Revere. I’m going to expose a new bill in Congress designed and championed by congressional Democrats called, “H.R. 5383: The Way Forward Act.” It’s so extreme, radical, hateful and offensive towards American citizens, it’s clear its only possible goal is the end of America.

I believe it represents pure evil. But I’ll report, I’ll let you decide.

I’m not exaggerating. This isn’t April Fool’s Day. It’s not a script for a new horror flick about zombies destroying America. Everything I’m about to tell you is real.

“The New Way Forward Act” says anyone and everyone in the world can come to America- no laws, no papers, no background check required. It eliminates illegal immigration.

And it makes it virtually impossible for anyone to ever again be deported, for any reason. Being here illegally will never again result in deportation. But neither will committing serious crimes. This bill brags about ending the “prison to deportation pipeline.”

No criminal can be deported for drug offenses, or fraud, or felonies; or depraved acts of moral turpitude- like sexual assault, child abuse, sex crimes against children. Any crime that carries a sentence of less than five years will no longer result in deportation. In many cases this includes manslaughter.

But even if you are convicted of a crime with a five year or longer sentences, like murder, rape or kidnapping, this bill gives liberal judges complete discretion to allow anyone to stay in the country.

The bill even eliminates the statute that bars anyone from immigrating to America if convicted abroad of drug crimes, or any crimes involving moral turpitude. So, rapists, child molesters, MS-13 and Mexican Drug Cartel gangsters, Democrats have a loud message for you:

“WELCOME YOU TO AMERICA.”

But I’ve saved the worst for last. The bill is retroactive.

It allows anyone and everyone ever before deported out of our country to come back in, as long as they would have been eligible under the provisions of the new law.

Worse, DHS must pay for all the criminals deported to come back with your tax dollars. The list of dangerous illegal alien criminals deported numbers in the hundreds of thousands. Their all invited back in, and YOU- the American taxpayer- are on the hook for plane tickets for all of them.

And of course, once here, they’ll all get free healthcare. Remember, every single Democrat running for president raised their hands in support of free healthcare for illegals.

Now you know I’m not being harsh, or exaggerating. Democrats really are extreme, radical, Kool-Aid drinking, America-hating, Stepford Wives. Democrats are intent on destroying America and your way of life.

And there is no way to compromise with people who believe in the end of America.

From this day forward, every Democrat running for president and every other office in the land must be asked by the media where they stand on “The New Way Forward Act.”

And if they support it, you are looking at pure evil.

Wayne Allyn Root is the host of “The Wayne Allyn Root Show” on Newsmax TV, nightly at 8 PM ET, found on every cable system in USA, plus DirecTV and Dish,

at http://www.newsmaxtv.com/Shows/The-Wayne-Allyn-Root-Show He is also a nationally syndicated radio host of “Wayne Allyn Root: Raw & Unfiltered” found at http://usaradio.com/wayne-allyn-root/

The post WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: This New Democrat Bill Defines Pure Evil appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: This New Democrat Bill Defines Pure Evil
Assistant Editor
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:30:37 GMT

And This Is Another Reason Why You Will Be Voting R.E.D., Remove All Democrats, 2020 Primary & General Elections!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) rips up the speech of President Donald Trump after his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Feb. 4, 2020. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) rips up the speech of President Donald Trump after his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Feb. 4, 2020. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters) Politics

House Rejects GOP Resolution Condemning Pelosi for Tearing up Trump’s Speech

By Jack Phillips February 6, 2020 Updated: February 6, 2020 FONT BFONT SText size Print

A Republican-sponsored resolution that condemned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for ripping up President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech was voted down in the House.

It was rejected in a 224 to 193 party-line vote, with all Democrats voting against it and all Republicans voting in favor of it.

At the end of Trump’s address on Tuesday evening, Pelosi was seen ripping up a copy of his State of the Union, later confirming that she did so as a symbolic gesture to protest against what she called a “manifesto of mistruths.” Following months of impeachment in both chambers of Congress amid heightened partisan divide in Washington, Pelosi’s move could be viewed as a sign of things to come during the 2020 election season.

Republicans in Congress have seized on Pelosi’s moment—which could be used as fodder during Republican campaign advertisements—and have called on her to apologize, while some GOP members said it was a “breach of decorum” and accused her of being disrespectful of Trump’s guests. Online, social media users and Republican lawmakers have begun spreading memes and doctored video footage.

Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas), who led the efforts on the resolution, said that regardless of the speaker’s “personal feelings,” Pelosi had a “responsibility to conduct herself with civility as the presiding officer representing the House of Representatives.” What’s more, she argued, Pelosi is the speaker of the House—not Democrats.

Pelosi rips Trump's speech
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tears her copy of President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address after he delivered it to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Feb. 4, 2020. (Patrick Semansky/AP Photo)

But Pelosi said that she wanted to call awareness to alleged falsehoods contained in the president’s address, saying Trump exaggerated or distorted his record on prescription drug prices, health care, and the U.S. economy at large.

“I tore up a manifesto of mistruths,” she told reporters Thursday. “It was necessary to get the attention of the American people to say, ‘This is not true. And this is how it affects you.’”

“He didn’t want to shake hands,” Pelosi added, saying that she read through the speech quickly. “I went right through that thing,” she said. ”I knew what was coming.”

She also criticized Republicans for chanting “four more years” during Trump’s address and described it as “totally inappropriate.”

The manner in which Trump delivered the address was also questionable, the speaker said, saying that it was tantamount to a “backdrop for a reality show.” His speech included the surprise reunion of a soldier with his wife, a fourth-grader finding out she got a scholarship, and cancer-stricken talk show host Rush Limbaugh receiving the Medal of Freedom from First Lady Melania Trump.

Young Turk, Cenk Uygur ATTACKS FLOTUS at a “CAIR Candidate Event”- Gets Shut Down By Patriots!

The enemy is within America! Wake UP!! Stand your ground!  Vote Republican through and through even if you have to hold your nose to do it!  CAIR is banned worldwide as a terrorist organization, except for a few countries like THE USA!  Why? 

Because they are already here and that is why these radical Islamist’s must be exposed and purged!  Thank God for these Patriots who shut this Anti-American debate as they called it, down! Their Sharia law stands contrary, the opposite, of what the US Constitution stands for, don’t be duped!

America takes in more immigrants than the entire world!  It is our duty to vet and remove every person who is here illegally or who are here to undermine this nation! You will know them by their words and their actions! 

#Uygur Is the FACE of the Enemy!  He is NOT for American values, just listen to his rage. He even admits he is an aggressive democrat who counter strikes. He plays on words, he speaks of the Muslim ban as if it’s for all Muslims when we know it is meant for the countries where we know Radicalized Muslims are bred! He’s lying to you to incite a fake hatred against our sitting President and his wife, our precious Melania!   DO YOUR DUTY! #VoteRepublican we do not have a choice! The fight for America has never been greater!

Weekly Update: Shocking Clinton News – Judicial Watch

Weekly Update: Shocking Clinton News

Source: Weekly Update: Shocking Clinton News – Judicial Watch

New Emails: Clinton’s State Department Gave Special Access to Foundation Donors
Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Email Questions under Oath
JW Forces Release of “Deleted” Clinton Emails – Hidden Emails Include Benghazi Material
Court Victory for Election Integrity
JW’s New Book Clean House Coming Next Week

 

New Emails: Clinton’s State Department Gave Special Access to Foundation Donors

The true nature of the Clinton Foundation becomes ever clearer with each discovery of withheld emails.

This week we released 725 pages of State Department documents that include email exchanges in which Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin provided influential Clinton Foundation donors special, expedited access to the secretary of state.

In one flagrant example, the Crown Prince of Bahrain was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation to get access to the secretary of state. He got it after pledging $32 million to the Clinton Global Initiative.

The new documents included 20 Hillary Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date to 191 of new Clinton emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.

The Abedin emails reveal that she apparently served as a conduit between Clinton Foundation donors and Hillary Clinton while Clinton served as secretary of state. In more than a dozen email exchanges, Abedin provided expedited, direct access to Clinton for donors who had contributed from $25,000 to $10 million. In many instances, Clinton Foundation top executive Doug Band, who worked with the Foundation throughout Hillary Clinton’s tenure at State, coordinated closely with Abedin. In Abedin’s June deposition to Judicial Watch, she conceded that part of her job at the State Department was taking care of “Clinton family matters.”

Among the Abedin-Band emails is an exchange revealing that when Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain requested a meeting with Clinton, he was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation for an appointment. Abedin advised Band that when she went through “normal channels” at State, Clinton declined to meet. After Band intervened, however, the meeting was set up within forty-eight hours.

According to the Clinton Foundation website, in 2005, Salman committed to establishing the Crown Prince’s International Scholarship Program (CPISP) for the Clinton Global Initiative. And by 2010, it had contributed $32 million to CGI. The Kingdom of Bahrain reportedly gave between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. And Bahrain Petroleum also gave an additional $25,000 to $50,000.

From: Doug Band

To: Huma Abedin

Sent: Tue Jun 23 1:29:42 2009

Subject:

Cp of Bahrain in tomorrow to Friday

Asking to see her

Good friend of ours

 

From: Huma Abedin

To: Doug Band

Sent: Tue Jun 23 4:12:46 2009

Subject: Re:

He asked to see hrc thurs and fri thru normal channels. I asked and she said she doesn’t want to commit to anything for thurs or fri until she knows how she will feel. Also she says that she may want to go to ny and doesn’t want to be committed to stuff in ny…

 

FromHuma Abedin [Huma@clintonemail.com]

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:35:15 AM

To: Doug Band

Subject:

Offering Bahrain cp 10 tomorrow for meeting woith [sic] hrc

If u see him, let him know

We have reached out thru official channels

Also included among the Abedin-Band emails is an exchange in which Band urged Abedin to get the Clinton State Department to intervene in order to obtain a visa for members of the Wolverhampton (UK) Football Club, one of whose members was apparently having difficulty because of a “criminal charge.” Band was acting at the behest of Casey Wasserman, a millionaire Hollywood sports entertainment executive and President of the Wasserman Foundation. Wasserman has donated between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation through the Wasserman Foundation.

The Abedin emails also reveal that Slimfast tycoon S. Daniel Abraham was granted almost immediate access to then-Secretary of State Clinton, with Abedin serving as the facilitator. According to the Clinton Foundation website, Abraham, like the Wasserman Foundation, has given between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. The emails indicate that Abraham was granted almost immediate access to Clinton upon request.

Additional Abedin emails in which the top Clinton aide intervenes with the State Department on behalf of Clinton Foundation donors include the following:

  • On Friday, June 26, 2009, Clinton confidant Kevin O’Keefe wrote to Clinton saying that “Kevin Conlon is trying to set up a meeting with you and a major client.” Clinton wrote to Abedin, “Can you help deliver these for Kevin?” Abedin responded, “I’ll look into it asap” Kevin O’Keefe donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Kevin Conlon is a Clinton presidential campaign “Hillblazer” who has raised more than $100,000 for the candidate.
  • On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Ben Ringel wrote to Abedin, “I’m on shuttle w Avigdor Liberman. I called u back yesterday. I want to stop by to see hrc tonite for 10 mins.” Ringel donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • On Monday, July 6, 2009, Maureen White wrote to Abedin, “I am going to be in DC on Thursday. Would she have any time to spare?” Abedin responded, “Yes I’ll make it work.” White donated $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • In June 2009, prominent St. Louis political power broker Joyce Aboussie exchanged a series of insistent emails with Abedin concerning Aboussie’s efforts to set up a meeting between Clinton and Peabody Energy VP Cartan Sumner. Aboussie wrote, “Huma, I need your help now to intervene please. We need this meeting with Secretary Clinton, who has been there now for nearly six months. This is, by the way, my first request. I really would appreciate your help on this. It should go without saying that the Peabody folks came to Dick [Gephardt] and I because of our relationship with the Clinton’s.” After further notes from Aboussie, Abedin responded, “We are working on it and I hope we can make something work… we have to work through the beauracracy [sic] here.” Aboussie donated between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • On Saturday, May 16, 2009, mobile communications executive and political activist Jill Iscol wrote to Clinton, “Please advise to whom I should forward Jacqueline Novogratz’s request [for a meeting with the secretary of state]. I know you know her, but honestly, she is so far ahead of the curve and brilliant I believe she could be enormously helpful to your work.” Clinton subsequently sent an email to Abedin saying, “Pls print.” Jill and husband Ken Iscol donated between $500,000 and $1 million to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton subsequently appointed Novogratz to the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board.

The newly obtained Abedin emails also contain a memorandum sent to Cheryl Mills from State Department White House liaison Laura Pena revealing that Rajiv Fernando was proposed for his controversial appointment to the sensitive International Security Advisory Board as early as June 2009. Fernando was not actually appointed until 2011, and his appointment raised a firestorm because, according to an ABC News report, “he had no obvious experience in the field.” Fernando donated $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.

The Abedin emails reveal that even U2’s Bono got into the act when former Bill Clinton aide Ben Schwerin, who helped set up the Clinton Foundation, urged Abedin to help the aging rock star broadcast from the international space station. In a May 27, 2009, email with the subject line “Bono/NASA,” Schwerin wrote, “Bono wants to do linkup with the international space station on every show during the tour this year.… Any ideas? Thks.” Bono has been a donor to the Clinton Global Initiative. And in 2011, he gathered top entertainers for “A Decade of Difference: A Concert Celebrating 10 Years of the William J. Clinton Foundation.” According to USA Today, “Some tickets were sold to the public for $50 to $550, and premium seats went for $1,000 to $5,000 on the Foundation website.”

This is the tenth set of records produced for Judicial Watch by the State Department from the non-state.gov email accounts of Huma Abedin. The documents were produced under a court order in a May 5, 2015, Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)) requiring the agency to produce “all emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013, using a ‘non-state’.gov email address.”

Hillary Clinton has repeatedly stated that she believes that the 55,000 pages of documents she turned over to the State Department in December 2014 included all of her work-related emails. In response to a court order in other Judicial Watch litigation, she declared under penalty of perjury that she had “directed that all my emails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or are potentially federal records be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.” This new email find is also at odds with her official campaign statement suggesting all “work or potentially work-related emails” were provided to the State Department.

In these emails we are seeing the most blatant abuse ever of a cabinet office. Hillary Clinton turned the State Department into a global revenue stream that enriched her private interests with millions of ill-gotten dollars. The scope of this pay-for-play corruption is simply staggering.

The release of this material caused another national firestorm, with lead stories in the Washington Post, New York Times, and widespread television news coverage.   Liberals and conservatives have called for special prosecutors and for the Clinton Foundation to be shut down.  Yet, incredibly, JW made even more news than this on the Clinton email story this past week.

 

Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Email Questions under Oath

Unlike Hillary Clinton and her allies in the Obama administration, federal courts tend to take the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) quite seriously.

Late last Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan’s granted us permission to submit interrogatories to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and to depose the former Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-IRM”) John Bentel.

The court order reads:

[T] the State Department shall release all remaining documents responsive to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act request by no later than September 30, 2016; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Judicial Watch may serve interrogatories on Secretary Clinton by no later than October 14, 2016 … Secretary Clinton’s responses are due by no later than thirty days thereafter … Judicial Watch may depose Mr. Bentel by no later than October 31, 2016.

In his opinion Judge Sullivan writes:

The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business.

On July 8, Judicial Watch submitted a request for permission to depose Clinton; the Director of Office of Correspondence and Records of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-CRM”) Clarence Finney; and Bentel. The request arises in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before Judge Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton. The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

Though we still think an in-person deposition is appropriate, we are pleased by the Court’s authorizing us to learn more about Clinton’s email practices from Mrs. Clinton – under oath.  We will move quickly to get answers.  If things stay on track, we should have answers from Mrs. Clinton, under oath, by the end of next month.  This decision – and the astonishing story below – is a reminder that Hillary Clinton is not above the law and that at least one federal court thinks she hasn’t answered all the outstanding questions about her emails.

 

JW Forces Release of “Deleted” Clinton Emails – Hidden Emails Include Benghazi Material

Our work on the Clinton emails issue yields incredible result after incredible result.  Just yesterday, a federal court ordered the State Department to review newly found Clinton emails and turn over responsive records by September 13.  And, in two other Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits, the State Department is scheduled to release additional emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s non-state.gov email system beginning September 30.  As if this wasn’t enough, in a court filing this week, the State Department admitted it had found Benghazi-related documents among the 14,900 Clinton emails and attachments uncovered by the FBI that Mrs. Clinton deleted and withheld from the State Department.

The first batch of new emails comes in response to a court order issued yesterday in a November 13, 2015, Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State seeking all communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House from the day of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and throughout the following week.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dr. Larry Kawa of Boca Raton, Florida, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division (Larry Kawa v. U.S. Department of State (No. 9:15-cv-81560)).  Yesterday’s order requiring the production of the emails from the 14,900 new Clinton emails, as well as any other communications or emails from the other materials recently delivered to the State Department by the FBI, was issued by U.S. District Court Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.  The court ruled:

The State Department shall search the material, determine whether any responsive records exist, and complete its first production of non-exempt records, to the extent any exist, by September 13, 2016.

In a separate case, JW has been seeking Clinton’s communications about the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, during which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith were killed.  A second assault targeted a nearby compound, killing two government contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00692)).

After admitting in an August 23 court filing that it found documents that “satisfied the [Benghazi related] search terms” of the new Clinton emails, the State Department proposed a rolling production schedule, “under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA onSeptember 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.”  Judicial Watch then asked the court that State make known the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed before it accepts whether the production schedule is reasonable.  And then – also yesterday – U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta informed the attorneys the Court wants to schedule a hearing on this issue for Tuesday, August 30!

There’s more.  We are also scheduled to receive documents from the State Department in a case arising out of FOIA lawsuit before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton.  The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).  Judge Sullivan ordered the State Department to release all remaining documents responsive to our FOIA request by no later than September 30, 2016.

The 14,900 new Clinton emails were uncovered as a result of separate Judicial Watch litigation seeking all of Mrs. Clinton’s work-related emails.  At a status hearing this week, U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the State Department to report to the Court the volume of documents reviewed and be prepared to commit to a production schedule at a further status hearing on September 23, 2016.  The revelation of the existence of all these additional emailsfurther rocked the nation.

It is difficult to overstate how scandalous it is that Hillary Clinton tried to delete and hide Benghazi emails and documents.  No wonder federal courts in Florida and DC are ordering the State Department to stop stalling and begin releasing the 14,900 new Clinton emails.

What a week this was!  Those of you of who support our work financially, thank you.  You make this success possible.  Those of who don’t yet support our work have even more ample reason to join our cause here!

 

Court Victory for Election Integrity

We’ve busy with Clinton emails, but not so busy as to ignore the core issue of protecting the integrity of elections from those on the Left who want to be able steal elections.  This week the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld an Ohio law that shortens the state’s absentee voting period from 35 to 29 days (Ohio Democratic Party v. Husted (No. 16-3561)). We had joined with the Allied Educational Fund (AEF) in filing an amici brief in the case.  It was good to be part of this victory for clean elections.

It sure is rewarding that the appeals court took the position we advocated.  Early voting is a bad public policy that unduly burdens the taxpayers, increases the likelihood of fraud, and confuses voters.  It was absurd and dishonest to suggest that racism was behind the sensible reform of cutting back early voting from an excessive 35 days before Election Day. The Left’s attack on election integrity, in partnership with the Obama Justice Department, doesn’t bode well for a clean November election.

This is why great decisions like the Sixth Circuit’s are important.  In its opinion the court wrote sensibly:

[P]laintiffs complain that allowance of 29 days of early voting does not suffice under federal law. They insist that Ohio’s prior accommodation—35 days of early voting, which also created a six-day “Golden Week” opportunity for same-day registration and voting—established a federal floor that Ohio may add to but never subtract from. This is an astonishing proposition. Nearly a third of the states offer no early voting. …The issue is not whether some voter somewhere would benefit from six additional days of early voting or from the opportunity to register and vote at the same time. Rather, the issue is whether the challenged law results in a cognizable injury under the Constitution or the Voting Rights Act. We conclude that it does not.

In our amici curiae brief with the Court of Appeals we argued that if it failed to reverse the lower court ruling, it “risks issuing a judgment that is not only wrong, but perverse, in that it might lead to lower voter turnout in direct contravention of one of the basic purposes of the Voting Rights Act.”

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, which ruled that the six-day reduction would disproportionately burden African Americans:

[A]lthough the Court cannot predict how many African Americans will turn out in future elections, it is reasonable to conclude from this evidence that their right to vote will be modestly burdened by S.B. 238’s reduction in the EIP [early in-person] voting period and elimination of SDR [same day registration].

Countering the district court’s position, the Judicial Watch/AEF brief cited a June 2016 report from the General Accounting Office (GAO) about the “depressant effect” of early voting:

We reviewed 20 studies from 12 publications, and these studies had varied findings. Seven studies found no statistically significant effect, another 8 studies found that the policy decreased turnout, and 5 studies reported mixed evidence.  Reported effects from these studies ranged from a 3.8 percentage point decrease in turnout to a 3.1 percentage point increase. [Emphasis added]

Judicial Watch and AEF concluded in our amici:

It is, then, a serious, open question as to whether the elimination of early voting will lead to lower voter turnout.  Because the plaintiffs have failed to present persuasive evidence establishing the likely effect of early voting on voter turnout, they have not met their burden of establishing their claims by a preponderance of the evidence.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, citing statistical evidence in support of the Judicial Watch/AEF argument:

[W]hile the challenged regulation may slightly diminish the convenience of registration and voting, it applies even-handedly to all voters… In fact, when compared to other members of the electorate, the statistical evidence in the record clearly establishes that Ohio’s political processes are equally open to African Americans.  In 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014, African Americans registered at higher percentages than whites, and both groups’ registration numbers are statistically indistinguishable in every federal election since 2006… The statistical evidence thus runs directly contrary to the district court’s speculative conclusion that the current S.B. 238 would have a disparate adverse impact on African Americans’ participation.

We have often partnered with AEF, which is a charitable and educational foundation, to fight government and judicial corruption and to promote a return to ethics and morality in the nation’s public life. This partnership has paid off again.  And we may have more honest elections as a result.

JW’s New Book Clean House Coming Next Week

Next Tuesday, August 30 is a big day for all of us at Judicial Watch.  Our new book, Clean House – Exposing Our Government’s Secrets and Lies, will be released to the nation.  You can pre-order the book hereClean House takes you through incriminating documents from the attack in Benghazi, Hillary Clinton’s secret emails, the IRS scandal, and the Obamacare swindle.

Americans are rightly worried they are losing their country. How did five Congressional committees miss the smoking gun on Benghazi?  How did Hillary Clinton keep a secret email server quiet for years?  Does the IRS audit you because of your politics?  Did the first American target of Obama’s drone program work for the US government?  How did Congress commit fraud to get Obamacare taxpayer subsidies?

Peter F. Schweizer, author of the groundbreaking and best-selling Clinton Cash, generously notes “If you care about the future of our country and want to make a difference, read Clean House.  It’s time to put both Democrats and Republicans on notice.”  And Fox News Channel Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew P. Napolitano kindly calls me “living proof that we can only remain free when we know what the government is doing.  Clean House is the story of his historic fight for government transparency.”

Again, Clean House goes on sale next week.  Help us make it a best-seller and show the Establishment that you agree with Judicial Watch that no one is above the law!

Soros gave Clinton step-by-step instructions on how to tackle Albania unrest – WikiLeaks email » Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!


Hillary a puppet for Soros
RT – AUGUST 12, 2016 151 Comments
Soros gave Clinton step-by-step instructions on how to tackle Albania unrest – WikiLeaks email
An email leaked by WikiLeaks reveals that when Hillary Clinton was US secretary of state in 2011, billionaire George Soros instructed her on how to handle unrest in Albania, stressing it “needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government.”
“Dear Hillary,” begins the email dated January 24, 2011 from the founder of Open Society Foundations, Soros.
“A serious situation has arisen in Albania which needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government. You may know that an opposition demonstration in Tirana on Friday resulted in the deaths of three people and the destruction of property,” Soros says, according to the leaked email.
Three men were shot dead as anti-government demonstrators clashed with police in the Albanian capital in late January of 2011. Supporters of the opposition Socialist Party refused to accept the results of a 2009 election, citing corruption and fraud, when then-Prime Minister Sali Berisha’s Democratic Party won by a thin margin. Berisha accused the opposition of attempting to provoke a Tunisia-style uprising, saying “the bastard children of Albania’s own Ben Alis conceived Tunisian scenarios.”

“There are serious concerns about further unrest connected to a counter-demonstration to be organized by the governing party… and a follow-up event by the opposition two days later to memorialize the victims,” Soros says.
“The prospect of tens of thousands of people entering the streets in an already inflamed political environment bodes ill for the return of public order and the country’s fragile democratic process,” he adds.
“I believe two things need to be done urgently,” he adds.
“1. Bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition leader Edi Rama to forestall further public demonstrations and to tone down public pronouncements.
2. Appoint a senior European official as a mediator.”
Soros suggested three candidates: Carl Bildt, Martti Ahtisaari, and Miroslav Lajcak, saying all “have strong connections to the Balkans.”
“The US and the EU must work in complete harmony over this, but given Albania’s European aspirations the EU must take the lead,” he stressed, adding that his foundation in Tirana was “monitoring the situation closely and can provide independent analysis of the crisis.”
Several days after the email was sent to Clinton, the EU did send one of Soros’ suggested nominees, Miroslav Lajcak, to meet Albanian leaders in Tirana to try to mediate an end to the unrest, Reuters reported.
In March, WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive consisting of 30,322 emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email server that she used while serving as US secretary of state. The 50,547 pages of documents cover Clinton’s correspondence from June 30, 2010 to August 12, 2014, of which 7,570 were sent by Clinton herself.
Last month, the whistleblowing website published an archive of over 1,200 of Clinton’s private emails pertaining to the Iraq War. Ahead of the release, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said the “upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton” would be enough to indict her.
Soros made a name for himself as the “man who broke the Bank of England” by engaging in questionable Forex hedging and betting against the sterling pound – which made him more than $1 billion in one day in September of 1992. Some have speculated that Soros has benefited from insider trading information when making investments. In 2002, a Paris court found Soros guilty of using inside information to profit from a 1988 takeover deal for bank Societe Generale.

Bridge Over Troubled Water 4 SURE!

July 26, 2016 Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, MD, PhD

Bridge Over Troubled Water 4 SURE!

Paul Simon’s “Bridge Over Troubled Water” Represents the DNC/HC!

Not one to miss a possible contentious Democratic Convention, I had just tuned into the ongoing palaver/festivities at just the wrong time.Unbeknownst to me, Paul Simon, the famous singer/songwriter was about to perform his famous song, “Bridge Over Troubled Waters”.

Literally within seconds of his singing, I was taken aback by the incredible shock of hearing an iconic entertainer, straining through the opening bars of his song with an enfeebled voice shrieking out every minor, flat, and diminished note of a once mellifluous song/voice. At that moment, I realized that I was hearing an air raid siren portending the opening of a potentially discordant Democratic Convention.

Unknown-12

I was not completely wrong.

Next, I saw Bernie’s followers boo the mention of Hillary’s name, refusing to stop until Bernie, himself, implored his devotees to settle down and “bond in unity with HC”.

The word ‘unity’ was spread so thick throughout the night that if I had not known better, I would have thought that Bernie and Hillary were conjoint twins, attached at the hip at some immaculate conception.Yet now, thanks to wikileaks, we know that Hillary and her Miami/yenta partner, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,were in collusion from the start to completely neutralize Bernie during his successful ascendancy through the Democratic presidential race.

In order to emphasize the concept of Democratic unity, mobbed-up/closeted, NJ Senator Corey Booker, strolled onto the stage and literally screamed at the top of his lungs. The words he spat out created a cacophony of meaningless sentences that simply ran onto one another, never resting to modulate his voice, or even attempting to make a unique important point.

Memo to Corey: Study and learn from the inspiring delivery of Rev. Marin Luther King. You need some work, kid.

images-27

Somewhere bracketed in between all of these patronizing vaudeville acts were two Borscht Belt comedians: Sen. Al Franken [D-Minn.] and Sarah Silverman.Both Jewish comedians played out a shtick that was neither funny nor enlightening; wherein Al [HC] and Sarah[Bernie] could find common ground because of the fact that they were —what?

Two people who supported opposing candidates?

Funny! NOT!

The rest of the variety show revolved around mythical accomplishments of the Clinton machinery, highlighting nothing more than palliative concepts like together, brotherhood,  diversity, inequality, minimum wage, etc.

I became so inured to the entreaties for “unity” because in the real sub-rosa world of political cronyism, both Bill and Hillary, belong together in a federal penitentiary cell for past, present, and future crimes committed by each one, together, and through their charitable foundation.

Now that is what I call UNITY of the criminal persuasion.

There is an old saying:

“Fire tries gold, misfortune men!”

Breaking News Bill Clinton corruption, clinton contamination, Corey Booker, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democratic Convention, Dems in Philly, DNC convention, feel the bern, Paul Simon

IceRocket Tags: ,,

SECRET SERVICE OFFICER SET FOR TV INTERVIEWS; BROADCAST NETWORKS BLACKLIST

SECRET SERVICE OFFICER SET FOR TV INTERVIEWS; BROADCAST NETWORKS BLACKLISTMON JUNE 20 2016 19:47:25 ET**Exclusive** Team Hillary is working overtime to block former Secret Service officer Gary Byrne from appearing on ANY broadcast network, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. Byrne is set to reveal what he observed inside the White House while protecting the First Family in the 1990s. ‘What I saw sickened me,’ Byrne explains. ‘I want you to hear my story.’ Byrne paints a picture of Hillary as a deranged madwoman running interference on Bill’s sexploits. The book ‘CRISIS OF CHARACTER’ is finally set for release next Monday. It has already became the top seller at AMAZON for the month of June.And now Clinton’s circle is preparing to hit back hard! POLITICO plans an early morning attack on Byrne’s credibility, sources claim, despite his having served in federal law enforcement for nearly thirty years. Meanwhile, Hillary’s campaign has won assurances that he will not be invited to spread ‘lies’ on any of the nation’s broadcast networks. ‘It’s trash for cash,’ a campaign official warned one producer. FOXNEWS ‘HANNITY’ will have the first exclusive for cable news, DRUDGE has learned. Developing…

Source: SECRET SERVICE OFFICER SET FOR TV INTERVIEWS; BROADCAST NETWORKS BLACKLIST