Tag Archives: Sedition

Wife of NSA Inspector General helped him plot Trump coup in Ukraine

And that’s putting it mildly! Pour yourself a drink, kick your feet up and read this very lengthy and involved chapter in a tale of an attempted coup and take down of America ~TiLT

Wife of NSA Inspector General helped him plot Trump coup in Ukraine

Jan 3

Mrs. Robert Storch (above), also known as Sara Matilthe Lord. Her husband is NSA Inspector General.

Storch her photo from 1992 frowning image.png

https://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/25/style/sara-lord-robert-storch.html

Storch marriage announcement NYT 1992 image whole story.png

https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1992/05/25/406892.html?pageNumber=20

Lord Sara image as wife of Storch.png

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/q-rstorch-071917.pdf

Sara M. Lord, Mrs. Robert P. Storch, recruits Ukrainian law students to investigate Trump supporters.

Sara was a former Justice Department attorney now in private practice.

Her husband, Robert, is Inspector General for the NSA. He is a lawyer for the Justice Department.

Mrs. Robert Storch, Sara M. Lord, helped train the last class of 39 from July 21st through July 26th, 2018.

As “investigators” using computer software.

In Dnipro, Ukraine.

Investigating who?

Whoops!

National Security.

Unable to say.

https://www.agg.com/news-insights/events/criminal-justice-in-action-07-25-2018/

The FBI installed a surveillance server in Kyiv, Ukraine.

In U.S. Embassy offices there.

Shared with the FBI.

Source is a joint FBI/Ukrainian crime unit press release dated Feb. 3rd, 2016.

The joint crime unit is called NABU or National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine.

NABU FBI gave them server Feb. 3rd 2016 image with photo.png

https://nabu.gov.ua/en/novyny/fbi-has-provided-nabu-equipment-digitizing-paper-documents

From the same press release, here are pictures of the FBI server and other computer hardware in Ukraine:

NABU FBI equipment one photo.png
NABU FBI equipment two.png
NABU FBI equipment three.png
NABU FBI equipment four.png

https://nabu.gov.ua/en/novyny/fbi-has-provided-nabu-equipment-digitizing-paper-documents

Mr. and Mrs. Robert Storch are partners in the coup to impeach President Donald J. Trump using Ukraine and the:

NABU is a partnership between the FBI and Ukrainian prosecutors.

To uncover corruption?

Or cover it up?

Lord in Ukraine July 25th 2018 image.png

https://www.agg.com/news-insights/events/criminal-justice-in-action-07-25-2018/

Lord three person standing from left photo.png

Mrs. Robert Storch is standing, third person from the far right, without her glasses. The latest Sara Lord recruiting class of 39 Ukrainian law students used to spy on Trump supporters from Ukraine. Students were called “NABU Detectives”. They all are fluent in English.

https://nabu.gov.ua/en/tags/criminal-justice-action

NABU July 2018 school detectives Lord image of two articles.png

https://nabu.gov.ua/en/tags/criminal-justice-action

NABU student shirt Criminal Justice in Action photo.png

https://nabu.gov.ua/en/novyny/nabu-detectives-shared-their-experience-conducting-pre-trial-investigation-criminal-justice

Lord NABU 2008 and 2009 image.png

https://www.agg.com/professionals/sara-lord/

Storch Mr Mrs June 25 2009 full article image.png

Sara M. Lord, aka Mrs. Robert Storch, are in Ukraine June 23rd, 2009.

They are attending a meeting of the State Audit Service with top officials from Ukraine.

http://www.dkrs.gov.ua/kru/en/publish/article/56088;jsessionid=DBD12FDCF98BBB16576FFC8C766FBD75.app1

Storch Mr Mrs photo two best.png

Bottom far left is Mrs. Robert Storch, Sara M. Lord. Sitting next to her is husband, Robert.

http://www.dkrs.gov.ua/kru/en/publish/article/56088;jsessionid=DBD12FDCF98BBB16576FFC8C766FBD75.app1

Storch Mrs only far right June 25 2009.png

Pictured at the bottom, far right in short sleeves, elbows on the table, is Mrs. Robert Storch, Sara M. Lord.

http://www.dkrs.gov.ua/kru/en/publish/article/56088;jsessionid=DBD12FDCF98BBB16576FFC8C766FBD75.app1

Who represented the U.S. in Ukraine during 2006 to 2009?

  • Sara Lord
  • her spouse, Robert Storch
  • Bill Taylor
  • George Kent

Yep.

The same Bill Taylor and George Kent who testified against President Donald J. Trump at the House Impeachment Hearings.

Taylor is U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine.

Kent is Assistant Secretary of State.

Kent’s office is with Taylor and the FBI in Kyiv.

Taylor Bill ambassador to Ukraine photo.png

https://ua.usembassy.gov/u-s-embassy-kyiv-is-pleased-to-welcome-ambassador-william-b-taylor-back-to-ukraine-as-charge-daffaires-a-i/

Kent George photo one.png

George Kent (above), Assistant Secretary of State

https://www.scribd.com/document/433926031/Testimony-George-Kent

FBI Kyiv Ukraine office map image.png

https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/legal-attache-offices

Storch+bio+to+House+of+Rep+Ukraine+corruption.png

Robert Storch failed to fully disclose his involvement in Ukraine with NABU and Ambassador to Ukraine, Bill Taylor, dating back to Dec. 2007.

Setting up NABU.

All three of them:

  • Storch
  • his wife, Sara Lord, who was also working as a Justice Dept. attorney for the FBI in Ukraine at the time
  • Taylor

His sworn testimony to the Senate and House was necessary for his appointment as Inspector General to the NSA.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO24/20170201/105513/HHRG-115-GO24-Bio-StorchR-20170201.pdf

Storch failed to disclose in written testimony on July 5th, 2017 to the Senate that:

  • he was applying for the position of auditor at NABU on May 25th, 2017 while being employed to the Justice Department
  • he was in Ukraine six times in 2016 and 2017

Six times?

Doing what?

Destroying evidence so that no one would know that the FBI was conducting surveillance on the President from Ukraine?

These disclosures, however, were made on live television in Ukraine on May 25th, 2017.

The video of Storch’s interview with the Ukrainian Parliament on May 25th, 2017 is below:

Please fast forward to the 58:58

Storch omitted this Ukraine video from his testimony to the Senate on July 5th, 2017.

Storch replaced Henry Ellard as Inspector General for the NSA on Dec. 22nd, 2017.

https://www.congress.gov/nomination/115th-congress/10?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22robert+storch%22%5D%7D&s=2&r=1

Storch never disclosed his role in setting up the NABU/FBI crime task force to President Donald J. Trump either.

Or that the task force was conducting illegal surveillance from Ukraine on:

  • 30,055 American citizens
  • Trump’s family, supporters, campaign workers, and key donors
  • Trump himself

In Storch’s defense, the Senate never asked to hear it.

Or read the transcript.

Who was supposed to disclose it to the President?

Who did Robert’s background check?

Peter Strzok or Andy McCabe?

https://brassballs.blog/home/robert-storch-inspector-general-nsa-surveillance-abuses-henry-ellard-spy-fbi-warrants-collyer-rosemary-fisa-foreign-intelligence-act-nabu-nellie-ohr-fusion-gps-take-down-president-trump-national-anti-corruption-ukraine-russian-dossier

Storch+face+sheet+page+Senate+hearing+confirmation.png
Storch+page+60+signature+Senate+committee.png

https://www.congress.gov/115/chrg/CHRG-115shrg26418/CHRG-115shrg26418.pdf

Storch Interfax story imag March 21st 2017.png

https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/410485.html

“Robert Storch . . . was recommended by the US Embassy in Kyiv.”

Source:

NABU logo.png
NABU FBI Embassy press release June 29th 2016 image.png

https://ua.usembassy.gov/memorandum-understanding-signed-fbi-nabu/

NABU/FBI started a joint crime unit on June 29th, 2016.

At the same time the FBI was trying to get a warrant to spy on the Trump family and campaign team.

From May 2016 to Oct. 2016 the surveillance on Trump was illegal.

Surveillance without a warrant.

It was finally approved on Oct. 25th, 2016.

And backdated to May, 2016.

The FBI moved their surveillance collection point to a server in Kyiv, Ukraine on Feb. 3rd, 2016.

In offices of NABU.

From there, the data was sent back to the FBI in Washington, D.C.

Who said so?

Nellie Ohr. She was a contractor for the FBI and CIA.

With top secret clearance.

She helped write the Russian dossier to take down Trump.

Her husband, Bruce, was once the fourth top ranking official in the Justice Department.

Nellie testified that the Russia dossier was delivered to her in the U.S. from the NABU unit in Ukraine.

https://brassballs.blog/home/nellie-ohr-trumps-family-schedules-from-fusion-gps-had-president-jacob-berkowitz-doug-collins-glenn-simpson-nabu-national-anti-corruption-ukraine-robert-storch-nsa-fbi-doj

Bruce and Nellie Ohr photo only two.png

Bruce and Nellie Ohr (above)

https://brassballs.blog/home/bruce-ohr-uses-student-spies-his-clinton-cronies-at-american-university-to-replace-president-donald-j-trump-with-hillary-clinton-susan-rice-sylvia-mathews-burwell-professor-james-goldgeier

NABU Embassy Yayanovitch top panel image.png
NABU Yoyanovitch middle panel end.png
NABU Embassy Yayanovitch bottom panel.png

https://nabu.gov.ua/en/novyny/ambassador-united-states-ukraine-visited-national-anticorruption-bureau-ukraine

Pictured in the above press release is Maria Yovanovitch (middle).

She was the former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine.

She testified against President Trump in the House Impeachment events.

Harry the Greek Patreon Twitter headline.png

https://brassballs.blog/home/robert-storch-inspector-general-nsa-surveillance-abuses-henry-ellard-spy-fbi-warrants-collyer-rosemary-fisa-foreign-intelligence-act-nabu-nellie-ohr-fusion-gps-take-down-president-trump-national-anti-corruption-ukraine-russian-dossier

https://brassballs.blog/home/artem-sytnyk-bill-clinton-ukraine-treaty-fbi-matthew-s-moon-comey-wray-nabu-national-anti-crime-unit-undisclosed-hidden-spy-data-intelligence-trump-american-citizens-sealed-mccabe-mueller

Source:

https://brassballs.blog/home/mrs-robert-p-storch-sara-m-lord-agg-com-arnall-golden-gregory-llp-nsa-inspector-general-impeachment-surveillance-abuses-spy-fbi-nabu-president-trump-national-anti-corruption-ukraine-fisa-bill-taylor-embassy-ukraine-kyiv-fbi-spies-law-students-dnipro

TiLTNews Network

The Once and Future Scandal – American Greatness

Elections

Soon the worm may turn. The real scandal is back on the horizon, and at last, we may learn that no one is above the law—most certainly not a group of smug and mediocre apparatchiks who assumed they had the moral right to destroy a presidential candidate and later an elected president.Victor Davis Hanson – February 9th, 2020

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Now that the four-and-a-half-month-long Ukraine impeachment bookend to the 22-month Mueller charade is over, it clearly accomplished nothing other than substantially raising the polls of both Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The public was reminded that Representative Gerald Nadler (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) are every bit as childish, peevish, and absurd as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

So, we are now back to the existential issue of the entire Trump phenomenon: to what degree did the Hillary Clinton campaign collude with high-ranking Obama officials, and the top echelons of the FBI, CIA, and the national intelligence apparatus, to surveil, defame, and hope to derail Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign by unlawful means?

Who in the federal government then continued Clinton’s efforts after the 2016 election to disrupt and indeed attempt to destroy the Trump transition and presidency?

Eventually, someone will sort out whether that post-election effort on the part of federal officials to abort the Trump presidency, abetted by the media and #TheResistance, was a simple follow-up to the Clinton-DNC-Perkins Coe-Fusion GPS collusion against candidate Trump—or a sick preemptive attempt of the administrative state to smear Trump as a “Russian asset” because of their worries about the exposure of their own prior criminality and Trump’s iconoclastic agenda.

But for now, the following statements are irrefutable.

Donald Trump, in concrete ways, has been far harder on Russia than was the “reset” Obama presidency, and far more helpful to Ukraine than Team Obama ever was. Trump armed the Ukrainians. He upped sanctions against Russia. He ordered lethal retaliation against Russian mercenaries in Syria. He vastly increased U.S. oil and gas production to Russia’s detriment. He jawboned Germany about its fuel dependence on Moscow. He coerced NATO to spend more on defense. He got out of an asymmetrical missile treaty with Russia. He is rebuilding the U.S. military.

The litany of these systematic abuses constitutes the greatest scandal in American history.

Unlike his predecessor, Trump did not dismantle U.S.-joint European missile defense in order to coax Putin into behaving during his reelection bid. He did not push a big plastic red reset button in Geneva to mark outreach to Putin, in rejection of prior Bush sanctions on Russians. He did not forbid the shipment of anti-tank missiles to an endangered Ukraine. He did not invite the Russians into Syria after a 40-year hiatus from the Middle East.

So the libel of Russian collusion was absurd from the get-go.

It originated in 2015-16 when the deep state was terrified over the then unlikely possibility of a President Donald Trump. The “collusion” ruse involved the chief players of federal law enforcement and national intelligence agencies. All, of course, had assumed Hillary Clinton would be president and their extralegal efforts to “insure” her victory would soon be commensurately rewarded, regardless of the illegality and unethical behavior required. And both crimes and amorality were most certainly involved.

See No Evil, Hear No Evil

The litany of these systematic abuses constitutes the greatest scandal in American history.

The FBI and the Justice Department deliberately misled Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges to spy on an American citizen as a way to monitor others in the Trump campaign. That crime is a charitable interpretation of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report, given that supposedly intelligent federal judges were told that the evidence for such state espionage was based on the “opposition research” of the 2016 campaign. And yet apparently in see-no-evil, hear-no-evil fashion, not one of the squishy judges ever asked the U.S. government, who exactly had paid for the Steele Dossier and why? After all, who was the “opposition” to Trump in late 2016?

Top Obama officials, such as Samantha Power and Susan Rice, in a panic over the Trump candidacy and then victory, requested the unmasking of scores of redacted names of those surveilled by intelligence agencies. Some of those names mysteriously, but certainly illegally, were leaked to the media with the intent of defaming them.

When Adam Schiff’s pernicious role in jump-starting the impeachment is finally fully known, he will likely be revealed as the prime schemer, along with minor Obama officials buried within the Trump National Security Council, dreaming up the entire Ukraine caper of the “whistleblower.”

Over the past three years during the Russian and Ukrainian farces, Schiff variously lied to the public about impending “bombshell” revelations of Trump “collusion.” His minority House Intelligence Committee memo outrageously alleged that the Steele dossier was accurate and truthful and yet was not the prime evidence for the granting of FISA warrants—two more lies exposed by Horowitz.

Schiff rigged the initial House impeachment hearings to exclude transparency and bipartisan access to witnesses. He read a false version of the Trump conversation with the Ukrainian president into the congressional record. He secretly data mined his own colleagues’ communications. And to the very last moments of the entire fraud, even in his dotage, he was still babbling in the Senate about the long-ago discredited “Russian collusion” and again stringing together absurd fantasies of Trump wishing to sell Alaska to the Russians.

Justice for the Wrongdoers?

Schiff was given a great gift with a quick Senate acquittal. If he had been called as a fact witness, he either would have had to lie under oath to refute his earlier myths, or continue them and compound his falsities.

The Mueller investigation—500 subpoenas, 22 months, $35 million—was one of the great travesties in American investigatory history. It was cooked up by fired, disgraced—and furious—former FBI Director James Comey. By his own admission, Comey conceded that he leaked confidential memos of private conversations he had with the president to create a large enough media and political storm to force the naming of a special prosecutor to investigate “Russian collusion.”

Comey is not yet in jail, in part, because his cronies at the FBI, including the disgraced Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, post facto, announced that the leaked Comey versions of his one-on-one talks with the president of the United States were merely confidential rather than top secret and thus their dissemination to the media was not quite felonious.

The rest is history. Comey’s leaking gambit paid off. It led to the appointment of his long-time friend and predecessor, former FBI Director Robert Mueller. Mueller then delighted the media by appointing mostly progressive activist lawyers, some with ties to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, in what then giddy journalists called a “dream team,” of “all-stars” who in the fashion of a “hunter-killer” team would abort the Trump presidency. They would prove Trump was what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on television called a “Putin asset.”

In surreal fashion, the main players, under suspicion for seeding and peddling the fraudulent Steele dossier among the high echelons of the U.S. government and using such smears to cripple Trump—John Brennan, James Clapper, and Andrew McCabe—were hired by liberal CNN and MSNBC as paid analysts to fob off on others the very scandals that they themselves had created.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating, and the Mueller team finally had to concede that it was born out a conspiratorial hoax by finding after 88 weeks—punctuated by almost daily leaks to sympathetic progressive media—that there was no Trump-Russian collusion to warp the 2016 election. Nor did it find actionable obstruction of justice on the part of Trump to thwart the investigation of what was admittedly a non-crime.

Yet Mueller’s team was marred with problems from the outset. The amorous and textually promiscuous pair of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were both fired for their rank partisanship, although Mueller and his team initially hid the reasons for their departures and staggered their firings to suggest a natural rotation. Mysteriously, hundreds of their incriminating texts have disappeared from FBI smart devices—a weirdness reminiscent of the FBI’s willingness not to examine Hillary Clinton’s computers that were hacked, as well as apparent unconcern that she destroyed thousands of subpoenaed emails.

Eric Clinesmith, another FBI lawyer, was fired by Mueller inter alia for his left-wing biases and tweeting out “Viva le [sic] Resistance”—as in long-live the World War II-like progressive resistance against the fascist and foreign occupier Trump. Clinesmith, according to the inspector general, altered an email presented as evidence before a FISA court to warp the request to surveil Carter Page. If there is any justice left in this sordid mess, he will end up in jail.

Four Years of Fakery

The end of the Mueller team was equally unceremonious. Mueller himself proved enfeebled in an embarrassing testimony before House committees, marked by the stunning admission he really had no idea what Fusion GPS was—the Glenn Simpson monstrosity that had hired the charlatan Christopher Steele, spawned the collusion myth and compromised top Justice Department officials such as Bruce Ohr, whose spouse worked for Simpson on the dossier.

When Mueller’s legal ramrod, progressive Andrew Weissman, finished up running the day-to-day operations of the “Mueller investigation,” in parody fashion he went to work—but of course—as a paid analyst for CNN where he no longer publicly had to suppress his loathing of the former target of his investigations.

The net effects of the Mueller and Horowitz investigations were variously to exonerate Trump, to expose a corrupt Justice Department, CIA, and FBI, to illustrate how the government hounded and ruined the lives of minor 2016 Trump campaign officials with largely process convictions and plea-bargained confessions, and to explain the peremptory resignations of more than a dozen top Washington officials of James Comey’s FBI—as well as the railroading General Michael Flynn.

Some of that skullduggery and more are currently the subjects of a criminal investigation by U.S. Attorney John Durham. The American public has been assaulted for four years by an array of fake scandals, fake bombshells, and fake televised analyses that camouflaged a systematic and terrible assault on our constitutional freedoms.

But soon the worm may turn. The real scandal is back on the horizon, and at last, we may learn that no one is above the law, and most certainly not a group of smug and mediocre apparatchiks who assumed they had the moral right to destroy a presidential candidate and later an elected president.

In sum, this real scandal, dormant for over four years, had been overshadowed by a series of progressive-government-media driven melodramas, aimed at both injuring the Trump presidency—and, in preemptive fashion, shielding a virtual coup to destroy an elected president.

Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson is an American military historian, columnist, former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He was a professor of classics at California…

https://amgreatness.com/2020/02/09/the-once-and-future-scandal/

TiLTNews Network

Why Is This Mueller Alumnus in Charge of the Justice Department’s FARA Unit?

Of the thousands of attorneys in the Department of Justice, it should be possible to find one who was not so closely associated with a project to use the Foreign Agents Registration Act as a pretext to meddle in and undermine the results of an American election.

Adam Mill – October 29th, 2019

Did the FBI tamper with the record of what former Trump campaign official and National Security Advisor Michael Flynn said to FBI agents? According to documents filed by Flynn’s attorney last week, it appears that none other than former FBI attorney Lisa Page participated in the editing of Flynn’s statement.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team then used the edited statement as proof of Flynn’s “lie.”

How can Brandon Van Grack, the lead prosecutor in the Flynn case, possibly defend a conviction of Flynn for lying to the FBI when the “lie” Flynn supposedly told was actually a statement edited and altered without Flynn’s participation? This latest bombshell is disturbing evidence that the U.S. Department of Justice remains a weapon in the hands of Democrats and the permanent bureaucracy.

Van Grack is more than just the tip of the spear for a particularly egregious operation to criminalize the Justice Department’s political targets—in this case, members of the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. He’s also a key veteran of the Mueller investigation. Unlike his colleagues who returned to private practice, Van Grack stayed behind to assume a powerful position within the Justice Department.

Van Grack currently wears two hats. In one of Attorney General Barr’s less-considered decisions, he placed Van Grack in charge of enforcing the very law that the Justice Department (and later the Mueller team) used as a pretext to spy on and leak against Trump in the 2016 election and his subsequent administration. Yes, Van Grack now wields the awesome and highly discretionary power of the unit that investigates and prosecutes violations of the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA).

To understand what a colossal mistake it is to put Van Grack in charge of FARA, it is helpful to review the FARA statute and its history.

In 1938, Congress passed the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which was intended to force agents of enemy governments such as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union to self-identify so the public could evaluate their speech or propaganda in light of their stated loyalties. Between 1966 and 2015, the Justice Department brought a total of seven cases, only one of which resulted in a conviction.

Beginning in 2016, however, FARA cases became all the rage.

The Justice Department recently created a new unit dedicated to sniffing out potential violators. On its surface, the statute has a politically neutral objective of informing the public of foreign influence. In practice, however, the law has become the go-to tool for partisan federal prosecutors. FARA prosecutions have tended to focus on Republicans even when Democrats commit the mirror image of the same violations.

One obvious recent example was the blatantly political selection of Paul Manafort as a FARA defendant, while politically connected Tony Podesta received an immunity deal for essentially the same behavior involving the same foreign clients.

Fusion GPS, which famously underwrote the Russia collusion hoax dossier, has piled up multiple FARA complaints (including unregistered work for Russia) that the Justice Department continues to ignore.

FARA is vague and subject to unbridled prosecutorial discretion. To demonstrate how vague, travel agents now register as “foreign agents” under the theory that marketing a tourist trip is a legally reportable act. It’s a perfect weapon to invoke secret surveillance pursuant to FISA and can be used against anyone with an international clientele. Nobody really knows what’s illegal until the Justice Department targets you.

A Potent Political Weapon in the Wrong Hands

Van Grack, who donated to Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, will also have enormous power in 2020 to decide whether candidate Joe Biden’s family should be investigated for foreign entanglements. For example, if Biden represented Ukraine natural gas company Burisma’s interests in demanding that the Ukrainian prosecutor be fired, Van Grack might be the person evaluating whether to charge that conduct.

FARA is a potent political weapon. Candidate Hillary Clinton hired Fusion GPS to gin up suspicions of a Trump-Russia association in order to create a hook for the Justice Department to launch a surveillance operation. The department predicated the application for the Carter Page FISA warrant upon supposed suspicions that he worked as an “agent” of a foreign power. Once the intelligence community had its surveillance in place, it repeatedly and illegally leaked the fruits (or supposed fruits) to undermine the insurgent candidate and later the new president.

Many of those illegal leaks appear to have come directly from the Mueller team during Van Grack’s tenure. It’s highly problematic that Barr would place Van Grack in charge of the kind of sensitive FARA-related information the Mueller team may have leaked during the investigation.

Indeed, Van Grack is a logical witness in potential investigations into those leaks. Guilt by association with foreigners remains such an irresistible weapon that Hillary Clinton recently (and improbably) accused Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. military veteran Tulsi Gabbard of being groomed by the Kremlin to run as a third-party spoiler in 2020.

But Van Grack’s participation in the abuse of the FARA law might not have begun with the Mueller team. Prior to working as the head of the FARA Unit and on Mueller’s team, Van Grack worked in the Justice Department’s national security division. There he worked with John Carlin, the architect of the Carter Page FISA warrant application. Carlin also signed one of the FISA court certifications that the court later found to be deceptive.

Conflicts of Interest

The Trump-hating press has already started cheerleading the prospect of Van Grack opening up a new front against Trump. A few days ago, The New Republic ran a story, “The Law that Could Take Down Rudy Giuliani,” referring to Van Grack’s new area of responsibility, the FARA law.

The New Republic is not alone. The corporate leftist legacy media, including the Washington Post, NPR, and Politico, have pushed Justice Department to use FARA to take down the president’s current attorney. Politico asks, “Is Rudy Giuliani Going To Jail?” The author is optimistic that Van Grack is well positioned to stick it to Giuliani. Another author drew up a mock indictment of Giuliani incorporating allegations related to the recent arrest of Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, two non-citizens the media have tied to the former New York City mayor.

Van Grack’s role as the Flynn prosecutor is totally incompatible with the role of prosecuting new FARA violations. Flynn’s attorney has accused Van Grack’s prosecution team of several acts of misconduct. I profiled a number of these violations here. Flynn’s legal defense team alleged multiple incidents of the government failing to disclose and/or preserve evidence. Remember the text messages between Lisa Page and her lover, former FBI counterintelligence chief Peter Strzok? There were actually two sets of cell phones, one issued by the FBI and a second the couple used while working for Mueller. When Mueller learned of the disturbing text messages sent between the first set of cell phones, he allowed the second set to be wiped of their data.

Flynn’s attorneys have alleged Van Grack committed misconduct in failing to ensure those cell phones were preserved and disclosed before Flynn’s plea. Questions about the political motivations of the Flynn prosecution persist. Flynn’s attorney also accused Van Grack’s team of attempting to coerce Flynn into lying, threatening to prosecute Flynn’s son, and hiding and even destroying evidence.

Thus, Van Grack brings all of that baggage into any new FARA prosecution which makes him less effective at catching real criminals posing real security threats to the United States. Indeed, Van Grack (who considers himself to be a “trial attorney”) has already lost two high profile cases in his new role.

Mueller’s entire investigation will be forever tainted by the blatant political corruption that infected it from the very beginning. Under Mueller, the spying and surveillance that began against candidate Trump continued against our sitting president (sometimes in coordination with Mueller and likely Van Grack).

In the Summer of 2017, Justice Department agents raided the offices of Trump’s private attorney, Michael Cohen, securing audio recordings that later leaked to the press. Justice officials obtained warrants for surveillance against Cohen. Mueller seized thousands of the Trump transition team’s emails without a warrant. Roger Stone complained that the Mueller’s team pressured him to lie in the headlong effort to get Trump at any cost.

Of the thousands of attorneys in the Department of Justice, one hopes it would be possible to find one to supervise the FARA unit who was not so closely associated with a project to use FARA as a pretext to meddle in and undermine the results of an American election. Van Grack should not be in a position to meddle in the 2020 election until he is cleared of any involvement in the FARA abuses and leaking of sensitive FARA-related information.

TiLTNews Network

Secret Hearings? Congress Not Allowed In? Due Process Being Trampled? Democrats Running a Secret Coup for their own Form of Government? SEDITION! This is TREASON!

TiLTNews Network

Ukraine president says ‘no blackmail’ in phone call with Trump | Fox News

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told reporters Thursday his controversial July call with President Trump involved no bribe, blackmail or quid pro quo, as impeachment-minded Democrats claim.

Zelensky spoke at a daylong event with media inside a Kiev food market, and said he believes the transcript released by the White House is accurate and that he knew the U.S. had withheld $400 million in military aid due to concerns about corruption and concern for American “taxpayer money.” But the issue, he said, was never linked to Trump’s desire that Kiev rekindle an investigation into an energy company with ties to former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.

“There was no blackmail,” Zelensky said. “They blocked this money and nobody asked us [for] anything,”

Trump responded to Zelensky’s comments Tuesday by tweeting: “The President of the Ukraine just stated again, in the strongest of language, that President Trump applied no pressure and did absolutely nothing wrong. He used the strongest language possible. That should end this Democrat Scam, but it won’t, because the Dems & Media are FIXED!”

He also continued to draw attention to Hunter Biden’s past business dealings, saying, “Where is Hunter Biden? He has disappeared while the Fake News protects his Crooked daddy!”

In his comments Thursday, Zelensky also told reporters his country will “happily” investigate whether Ukrainians interfered in the United States’ 2016 elections – a topic Trump also broached with him during his July phone call with the leader.

Zelenskiy said “we can’t say yes or no” as to whether there was any interference without an investigation.

A whistleblower’s claim that Trump implied in the July 25 phone call that restoration of the aid would be conditioned on Ukraine reopening a probe of Burisma Holdings and the Bidens’ involvement in the matter has prompted Democrats in the House to launch an impeachment inquiry. On Tuesday, Fox News contributor John Solomon reported that the Ukrainian government had already ordered a reopening of the probe of Burisma Holdings months before the two presidents spoke by phone.

BIDEN CAMPAIGN SLAMS NEW YORK TIMES FOR RUNNING ‘CLINTON CASH’ AUTHOR”S CRITICAL COLUMN

The military aid was later released to Ukraine, and President Trump has denied the whistleblower’s claims. The White House has also refused to cooperate with what it claims is an unconstitutional impeachment effort by House Democrats.

The White House sent an eight-page letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Tuesday that read: “President Trump and his administration reject your baseless, unconstitutional efforts to overturn the democratic process. Your unprecedented actions have left the president with no choice.

“In order to fulfill his duties to the American people, the Constitution, the Executive Branch, and all future occupants of the Office of the Presidency, President Trump and his administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances.”

Zelensky, a 41-year-old actor, comedian and screenwriter elected in May, has sought to reverse his country’s image as a hotbed of corruption. He told reporters Thursday that the main purpose of his conversation with Trump was to set up a meeting with the American president and show reform measures were in place in Ukraine.

“We just wanted to establish relations,” he said, adding at one point, “the story with Burisma has nothing to do with weapons.”

Trump and other Biden critics question how Hunter Biden, who reportedly knew little about the energy business and the country, ended up on Burisma’s board while his father was vice president and spearheaded Ukraine relations under President Barack Obama. The elder Biden was later recorded bragging about how he pressured Ukraine to oust a prosecutor who had been looking into the company’s founder, though Biden allies say this intervention was driven by corruption concerns.

It is unclear how much money Hunter Biden made while serving on the board of the firm, but reports have estimated he made up to $1 million per year.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Ukraine president says ‘no blackmail’ in phone call with Trump | Fox News

TiLTNews Network

HERE WE GO: Giuliani Says The Next Couple Weeks Will Be Huge, Goes After Obama

Posted October 9, 2019 in Politics

On Tuesday evening, former New York City Mayor and President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and former US Attorney Joe diGenova hammered the House Democrats impeachment inquiry during an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham.

Giuliani shocked Fox News viewers when he dropped several bombs about former President Barack Obama and how he may be involved with the ongoing scandals.

“For years Obama had a pay for play operation in his administration and it’s disgusting and one of the reasons they’re fighting so hard.” Giuliani started. “If Biden comes out, so does Clinton come out and about three others. This goes right to the top of the Obama administration and the administration that says, ‘I didn’t have scandals’ will be the most scandal ridden administration in our history. Obama didn’t care about ethics. He didn’t care otherwise it wouldn’t happen.”

DiGenova jumped in saying, “That’s right”

Giuliani continued: “A Vice President should have been stopped from doing this by a President who had the slightest bit of integrity. But a Chicago ‘pol’ like Obama – pay for play eight times – millions of dollars to your Vice President [Biden] and hundreds of millions of dollars to your Secretary of State [Hillary Clinton]. They just bought the offices. Crooks.”

WATCH the clip below:

https://twitter.com/joehoft/status/1181897653765820419?s=20

Giuliani has been on a warpath in recent weeks by not only defend President Trump, but also to hammer the Democratic party.

Last week during Fox News host Sean Hannity’s primetime show, Giuliani dropped yet another bomb when he announced that he has evidence that the Obama White House told Democrats to work with the Ukrainians to find damaging information on then-candidate Donald Trump.

“The reason why the president of the United States had an obligation to ask the president of Ukraine to follow up on these allegations because there is substantial — I don’t want to exaggerate it but pretty close to overwhelming evidence, including a finding by a Ukrainian court that Hillary Clinton and the Democrats cooperated with Ukrainians with the order coming directly from the White House … to dig up dirt on her political opponent, and they did,” Giuliani said.

Giuliani continued by talking about former Vice President Joe Biden and the allegations he is facing surrounding Ukraine.

“In this case, Biden sold his office for millions,” Giuliani stated. “Is there anybody that believes that Ukraine or China were paying for Hunter Biden’s expertise? Or do you have the common sense to realize they were buying Joe Biden’s office? And that is very damaging to the United States. Joe Biden was sent to Ukraine to, in part, deal with corruption, and he helped to corrupt the Ukraine. He is a laughingstock.”

***NEWLY RELEASED Trump 2020 Hat – Yours Free***

“We are [a laughingstock] because we talk about corruption and this guy puts his incompetent son to work for the most crooked oligarch in Russia? I mean, it is outrageous,” he continued. “The only really sad part of this … is how much in the tank and how corrupt this media has become. They have corruption staring them in the face and they closed their eyes to it, and then they make up charges against President Trump that aren’t true. They don’t look at this whistle-blower. He is giving them hearsay evidence.”

“And I’m going to tell you one other thing — Biden’s corruption helped to cover up all of the allegations of collusion because there was a company involved run by George Soros which was involved in the investigation, and that was closed down to cut off all of the proof, the additional proof, of just how far the Democrats went in corrupting the 2016 election and in corrupting the Ukraine,” Giuliani ended.

TiLTNews Network

Bombshell Admission: Clapper Says Obama Made Them Do It

Oct 7, 2019

RUSH: Audio sound bite number 10, this morning on CNN Jim Sciutto is talking to James Clapper, who was as corrupt as Brennan, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence. And Jim Sciutto says, “Are you concerned that Barr or Durham’s investigation will find wrongdoing and seek to punish former intelligence officials like you?”

CLAPPER: The message I’m getting from all this is, apparently what we were supposed to have done was to ignore the Russian interference, ignore the Russian meddling and the threat that it poses to us, and oh, by the way, blown off what the then commander in chief, President Obama, told us to do, which was to assemble all the reporting that we could that we had available to us —

RUSH: Wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! Stop the digital. Did you hear what he just said? He just said (imitating Clapper), “And, by the way, should we have just blown off what Obama told us to do?” Does he know what he’s just done here? Clapper on CNN today said Obama made us do it. Here, finish the bite or play it from the top, whichever you have ready to go.

CLAPPER: — and put it in one report that the president could pass on to the Congress and to the next administration. And while we’re at it, declassify as much as we possibly could to make it public, and that’s what we did.

SCIUTTO: One issue I’m — (crosstalk)

CLAPPER: It’s kind of disconcerting now to be investigated for, you know having done our duty and done what we were told to do by the president.

RUSH: Well, so now he doesn’t like it! Now that he’s being investigated here by Barr and Durham, he says, “Hey, it was Obama. We’re just doing what Obama told us to do,” which we’ve always suspected. But I find it fascinating the way he characterizes this. (impression) “Well, uh, apparently what we were supposed to have done is — is just ignore the Russian interference.” There wasn’t any. There wasn’t any Russian interference. You can’t prove it. There wasn’t any. Don’t give me the $150,000 ad buy the Russian troll farms made on Facebook after the election.

The Russians didn’t tamper with any votes. The Russians didn’t effect anything on any election result anywhere. The Russians did not meddle. You know, it really comes off of that. These people are still living off the idea the Russians meddled because they might have wanted to, the Russians interfered because they might have wanted to — and because Mueller went to the obvious step of making sure some Russians were indicted. We couldn’t find any Russians in the story!

From the beginning, the only Russian in the story was that fat ambassador who took everybody to lunch, Kislyak. Other than that, there weren’t any Russians in the story! So here comes Clapper (impression), “Are we supposed to just ignore it, uhhhh, and the threat it posed to us and, uhh, were we supposed to blow off what Obama told us to do?” See, this is such a misstatement of what went on. They concocted all of this! The Steele dossier is how they concocted all of this! Clapper was instrumental in the Steele dossier ending up in the news on CNN.

Let me tell you that story briefly. January 6, 2017. Obama’s still in office. Trump has not been immaculated yet. They’ve got the Steele dossier. They’re desperate to get this thing in the news! They’re desperate to get it out there that Trump hired prostitutes to urinate on a bed Obama had slept in. So Comey and Brennan and Clapper have a meeting with Trump at Trump Tower on June 6th. At the end of the meeting, Comey says, “Look, I need to talk to the president about something,” and sends Clapper and Brennan out of the room.

At that point, Comey pulls out the dossier and says, “Mr. President, I know you said that you don’t like having intel briefings every day, but let me just show you why you should. This is the kind of stuff that’s out there, Mr. President” and he shows him one thing in the Steele dossier, the golden showers story. One thing. Comey… It was a setup. He was hoping to get some kind of Trump verbal response that they could then say was confirmation or something or other. But barring that — and Trump did not say anything that Comey could go out and quote.

So when Trump says, “It’s silly, this is crazy, it’s asinine. Why are you wasting my time with this?” Comey leaves and calls Clapper, who had just left the room moments ago. Comey calls Clapper and says, “Mission accomplished.” This is Comey’s own testimony of this before a congressional committee. He called Clapper and said, “Mission accomplished.” Clapper called CNN and told them the president had just been shown the details of the Steele dossier. That made the Steele dossier reportable. That meant that they could now report it.

It had been floating around Washington since the summer, but there was no way to use it because it was unverified, uncorroborated. It was all BS. But presenting it to the president makes it news. (impression) “The president has now seen the golden showers story from the Steele dossier!” So Clapper calls CNN; CNN runs with that story. “The president’s now aware! The president has seen it.” BuzzFeed takes the occasion to publish the entire dossier. Then CNN starts doing fake news and gets a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on Trump learning about the dossier.

They get a Pulitzer Prize from an orchestrated, coordinated plan for James Clapper — now, apparently following orders from Obama — to leak to CNN that Trump had been presented this story. That is one of the most glaring examples. There are countless stories like this throughout this sordid three-year period. But this is how they got the dossier in the news. The whistleblower is how they’re getting in the news that Trump lied to the Ukraine president — or not lied, but conspired to get Biden.

They’re running the same play, folks. They’re running the same play. It’s like last night, the Baltimore Colts… I’m sorry. (chuckles) The Indianapolis Colts ran the same running play against the Chiefs. The Chiefs couldn’t stop the running game last night. The Colts are averaging 5.3 yards a carry. They ran the same play — to the left side of the line once, to the right side of the line. But the same formation, the same blocking assignments. The ball carrier just chose a different route. They ran the same play when they saw it was working.

It might be a different game. It might be some other team that ran the play over and over when they find out the defense wasn’t prepared to stop it. But that’s what the Democrats are doing. They’re running the same play as Kavanaugh, Russian collusion. They’re making up some story — the Steele dossier, golden showers — and giving it to the media. The media reports it. In this case, the whistleblower calls Schiff, “I got this great thing! I can tell you what Trump said to the Ukrainian president!” It’s all made up. It’s all an ongoing illusion.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I want to go back to this Clapper bite because, folks, this is a gigantic deal. This is a big deal. This is James Clapper admitting that what all happened during the Trump-Russia collusion thing was ordered by Barack Obama. Listen again. Sound bite number 10.

CLAPPER: The message I’m getting from all this is, apparently what we were supposed to have done was to ignore the Russian interference, ignore the Russian meddling and the threat that it poses to us, and oh, by the way, blown off what the then commander in chief, President Obama, told us to do, which was to assemble all the reporting that we could that we had available to us and put it in one report that the president could pass on to the Congress and to the next administration. And while we’re at it, declassify as much as we possibly could to make it public, and that’s what we did.

SCIUTTO: One issue I’m — (crosstalk)

CLAPPER: It’s kind of disconcerting now to be investigated for, you know having done our duty and done what we were told to do by the president.

RUSH: I’ve been waiting for this. A lot of people have been waiting for this. Here’s Clapper saying, “I didn’t do anything wrong! We didn’t do anything wrong, ’cause we were doing what Obama told us to do.” The question he was asked is (summarized), “Are you worried about this investigation that Barr and he’s team’s running against you? Are you worried? You, Clapper and Brennan, are you guys worried?” (muttering) “Oh, no. Of course not. Why? (muttering) The president told us to do all that! (muttering) Obama was the president of the United States. Uhhh, the chief executive, uh, commander-in-chief told us to do all that.”

Really?

Folks, can you say in any other time and place “bombshell”?

TiLTNews Network

THE HUMAN STORY