The Professor's Record
122K subscribers
1.64K photos
696 videos
47 files
1.8K links
Official telegram channel for Professor David K. Clements


Arbitration room to reenter chat:
Download Telegram
#FightBack has admitted that $58,000 was raised and specifically allocated for the NEW MEXICO audit.

For some unexplained reason, an independent award of $50,000 given to EchoMail for its work in ARIZONA, keeps being conflated with money allocated for NEW MEXICO.

Volunteers and experts have made peace with the fact that money from FightBack has been withheld wrongly.

While I am no longer a board member of FightBack, I maintain an ethical fiduciary duty to donors from the time I served. All other FightBack board members that served during that time (except one) will confirm that solicitations for the New Mexico Audit were distinct from money dispersed for Arizona.

Erin and I don’t charge a dime for the cause of fixing 2020, and will gladly pay out of pocket the tens of thousands of dollars from our personal bank account for the purchase of scanners, computers, and materials to continue audit work in eight NM counties and counting.

God has provided abundantly and will continue to do so.

With all that said, that doesn’t mean that donors should have to absorb the cost.

If you donated to #FightBack for the NEW MEXICO audit initiative, you have every right to demand a full refund.

Maintaining those funds for unallocated purposes could be construed as an illegal personal inurement. For example, amounts allocated to audits, but instead being spent on personal security to the tune of $40,000 a month for one FightBack board member is something you should be aware of.

I don’t grift.

I don’t charge a dime and money has no hold on me.

But donors are entitled to getting the benefit of what they donated to.

Demand a refund at

You can inquire from current board members, including recent law school graduate John Exum and Lin Wood. I’m unsure if there are any other board members left.

The auditors and volunteers in New Mexico will be just fine.
“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.

And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you. - Matthew 5:38-42

God always provides.
Erin and an amazing team of volunteers in Los Alamos, NM scanned ALL of the physical ballots and envelopes yesterday in the county.

The process, chain of custody, was done by the book.

We have even more evidence collected.

As promised, we will continue to provide updates on multiple audits throughout New Mexico.

Finally, the next county commission meeting in Otero county will be held June 9th.

The fate of the machines will be voted on.

The people of Otero need to show up and make their voices heard.
The artificially inflated voter rolls in New Mexico are a disaster. In every county.
I’m currently reading Marco Polo’s report. Thus far, it is a work of art and will be the definitive document on the Biden laptop.

Thoroughness, citations, easy to read.

Well done.
Forwarded from Marco Polo
Marco Polo has been busy.

Our nonprofit research group just made public a searchable database of +128k emails from the Biden Laptop. Never in American history has so much primary source evidence of criminality been available regarding the sitting pResident and his family.

The email database has received a fair amount of press: Zero Hedge, Newsmax , Fox Business, The Times (UK), Sky News, et al.

With the release of the email database, readers will be able to “fact-check” our (forthcoming) 590 page Report as they go along. The Report has taken twice as long as we expected, but it’s also twice as good, and it’s still under budget. 

If you want to sign up for email alerts and/or contribute to Marco Polo (EIN: 61-199994), you can do so here.

- - -

We were also the only nonprofit on Earth to publish the complete list of human traffickers involved in the Larry Ray sex cult. The list of traffickers was inadvertently posted to the public docket as Government Exhibit #3217. The list can be found here.
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
Media is too big
Two people have plead guilty to ballot harvesting in Arizona.

One is a Democrat politician who plead guilty to CONSPIRACY charges and is giving up the names of her accomplices.

Forwarded from The Professor's Record
"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away."
Forwarded from New Mexico Audit Force (Erin Clements)
Many thanks to those of you who helped us out in submitting that public documents request that was being ignored by the SOS. Her office finally found the time to fulfill the request after 8 months and a few dozen duplicate requests!

I see now why she didn't want to hand over the documents requested. They contained the letter above which states that NM law requires all election systems to comply with the most recent version of the EAC guidelines (VVSG 2.0).

Unfortunately, as the SOS explains, there are no election systems that comply with the most recent guidelines because the EAC has let the entire certification process lapse and there aren't even any certified testing laboratories in the country to tell us whether a voting system meets VVSG 2.0 or not.

So by law, the Dominion voting system is illegal to use in New Mexico and the SOS knows it!

We actually talked about this problem in our report we published in October 2021. It's just good to see the SOS admitting we are right in her own words.
Forwarded from ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸 (Pepe Lives Matter)
Kash told X22 that he believes Sussmann will be convicted.
When asked if Durham is protected Kash laughed and said yeah. He’s not worried about that at all. 😎
Comfy AF!

Full interview here:
Arrived in Greenville, SC, and looking forward to Christian fellowship and sharing of the Gospel tomorrow.
Forwarded from The Professor's Record
Uplifting conference to refocus our eyes on Jesus, The Truth given in His Word, and Accomplish His work for America.

Please register at

Saturday, May 28, 2022
Greenville, South Carolina

Please repost everywhere allowed.

Forwarded from Two Red Pills Channel
Please read the post above from New Mexico. Their SoS (in Utah it’s the Lt Gov) knows the machines can’t be certified. But Utah law - like NM - requires that they are…..

Go back to our interview with Alex Newman about EAC and the ES&S machines not being certified.

Now it’s probably making sense why our Lt Gov not only hijacked my and Sophie’s lawsuit and threatened every county to not give us any data, but just this morning the AG’s office filed their SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS our case to get election data…. Is it just us or are these agencies PANICKING!

Exposure of truth is their biggest fear. But we will be their nightmare. We will not quit. We will win this. 🇺🇸
Thank you John for the retraction. All is forgiven. I hope and pray we can work together in fixing 2020.
Forwarded from XmFactor
I have retracted my post with the video showing David Clements’s name not popping up in LexisNexis.

This afternoon I confirmed that the New Mexico Court system at the trial level is NOT part of the LexisNexis database. I had no reason, in my view, to anticipate that. I had operated on the assumption that because LEXIS-NEXIS had all 50 states in the database that it had all court levels in its database. In law school I hardly ever researched anything at the trial level. I was always looking for black letter law at the appellate level.

Be that as it may, that explains why my results for David Clements as an attorney in New Mexico came up empty. I suppose I would in part chalk my oversight up to a heat of the battle type of moment, following his presentation in North Carolina, which had irritated me. My irritation prompted me to look into him, and see what he had done as a trial lawyer. I was shocked at what I thought I’d found.

I was completely transparent in how I had conducted my research for the video. Flawed as it was, I did what I did in good faith. I did not explicitly accuse David of wrongdoing, but others have made potentially made false inferences about his work history on the basis of my screen recording.

I promised I would stand for truth, no matter what the truth turned out to be – even if the truth reveals me to have been mistaken. The truth here is that I did have some oversights in my research process.

While my actions were in good faith, I do apologize to David – and to all who read what I had posted – for any pain and confusion I might have caused.
Let’s unite to fix 2020.