Category Archives: Land of the Free | Perspective

The Khorasans: As Fake As the Kardashians Washington's Blog

The Khorasans: As Fake As the Kardashians Washington’s Blog.

The Khorasans: As Fake As the Kardashians

New Boogeyman Has Already Been Debunked

Obama is now – after the fact – scrambling to justify bombing the sovereign nation of Syria without the permission of either the Syrian government or even the United States Congress by saying that we were going after the super-evil Khorasans, who were about to attack us.

My God!  That sounds terrifying … like a cross between Genghis Khan, Klingons and the Kardashians!

The U.S. is saying that they’re even more dangerous than ISIS.

There’s just one wee little problem … the Khorasan threat is as as fake as the Kardashians’ physiques. (Admittedly, it’s confusing, given that the Kardashians have also inserted themselves right in the middleof the Syrian conflict.)

Agence France-Presse reports:

The US says it has hit a little-known group called “Khorasan” in Syria, but experts and activists argue it actually struck Al-Qaeda’s affiliate Al-Nusra Front, which fights alongside Syrian rebels.

In announcing its raids in the northern province of Aleppo on Tuesday, Washington described the group it targeted as Khorasan, a cell of Al-Qaeda veterans planning attacks against the West.

But experts and activists cast doubt on the distinction between Khorasan and Al-Nusra Front, which is Al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch.

In Syria, no one had ever heard talk of Khorasan until the US media brought it up,” said Rami Abdel Rahman, director of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

“Rebels, activists and the whole world knows that these positions (hit Tuesday) were Al-Nusra positions, and the fighters killed were Al-Nusra fighters,” added Abdel Rahman, who has tracked the Syrian conflict since it erupted in 2011.

Experts were similarly dubious about the distinction.

“The name refers to Al-Qaeda fighters previously based in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran who have travelled to Syria to fight with… Al-Nusra,” said Matthew Henman, head of IHS Jane’s Terrorism and Insurgency Centre.

They… should not be considered a new or distinct group as such.”

Aron Lund, editor of the Syria in Crisis website run by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, raised similar doubts.

The fact that news about this Al-Qaeda-run, anti-Western cell linked to Al-Nusra emerged just over a week ago, through US intelligence leaks — well, it’s certainly an interesting coincidence,” he told AFP.

***

Claims of a distinction are lost of many of Syria’s rebels, who have also often rejected the world community’s designation of Al-Nusra as a “terrorist” group.

When Washington added Al-Nusra to its list of “terrorist” organisations, even the internationally-backed Syrian opposition National Coalition criticised the decision.

***

On the ground, almost all rebel groups have been willing to cooperate with Al-Nusra, seeing them as distinct from the Islamic State group (IS), which espouses transnational goals and includes many non-Syrians among its ranks.

***

[The] history of cooperation [between the various crazies in Syria] has left some rebels and activists on the ground suspicious and even angry about the strikes on Al-Qaeda.

***

Some key members are believed to maintain channels of communication with Al-Nusra, including Qatar, which has helped negotiate the release of prisoners held by the group.

McClatchy adds:

Raad Alawi, the commander of a smaller group of fighters, the Squadrons of Al Haq, told McClatchy he was very angry.

“Starting the war with the bombing of Nusra is an indication that this is a war against the revolution and not [ISIS] … “Maybe next they will bomb the bases of the Free Syrian Army.”

Well, okay … experts and Syrian Islamic jihadis think there’s no distinction between the Khorasans and plain vanilla Al Nusra/Al Qaeda/Free Syrian Army fighters.

But surely America and our allies treat the moderate Syrian rebels … I mean Al Nusra …  er, I mean theKhorasans … with a consistent iron fist?

Well, no … we’ve been – directly or indirectly – backing them.  And – as we’ve been warning for some time – the boys we’re arming are threatening to attack us.

So – while I’d like to believe that I’m being shown the real deal as a justification for long-term, direct involvement – I’m just not buying it …

Bush’s “Axis of Evil” Becomes Obama’s “Network of Death” | Ben Swann Truth In Media

Bush’s “Axis of Evil” Becomes Obama’s “Network of Death” | Ben Swann Truth In Media.

Bush’s “Axis of Evil” Becomes Obama’s “Network of Death”

By: Rachel Blevins Sep 25, 2014

0

http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1411606707.html#_=1411675127749&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fbenswann.com%2Fbushs-axis-of-evil-becomes-obamas-network-of-death%2F&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fbenswann.com%2Fbushs-axis-of-evil-becomes-obamas-network-of-death%2F&size=m&text=Bush%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%9CAxis%20of%20Evil%E2%80%9D%20Becomes%20Obama%E2%80%99s%20%E2%80%9CNetwork%20of%20Death%E2%80%9D&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbenswann.com%2Fbushs-axis-of-evil-becomes-obamas-network-of-death%2F&via=BenSwann_

1

When Barack Obama ran for President of the United States in 2008, he was adamant about setting himself apart from President George W. Bush. However, given Obama’s recent announcements regarding the war in the Middle East, it has left many wondering just how different Obama is from his predecessor.

In his campaign for election in 2008, and in his campaign for re-election in 2012, Obama emphasized the fact that he intended to “end the war in Iraq.”

While Obama followed through on his promise, and all troops were removed from Iraq by December 2011, his recent decision to attack Islamic State militants in both Iraq and Syria via airstrike has left the country wondering whether ground troops returning to Iraq will be the next step.

Despite his attempt to set himself on the opposite end of the spectrum from Bush, Obama’s latest strategy has many looking back at when back at Bush’s actions prior to sending ground troops into Iraq in 2003.

In January 2002, President Bush gave a State of the Union Address, in which he warned the American people of the danger posed by the Iraqi regime, and insisted that the United States must take action.

States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.

Bush vowed that the United State would work closely with their “coalition” to deny terrorists and their state sponsors “the materials, technology and expertise to make and deliver weapons of mass destruction.

Bush also highlighted the fact that Americans should fear the Iraqi regime, because of its hostility toward America, and its support for terror.

This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens, leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children,” said Bush. “This is a regime that has something to hide from the civilized world.”

On Wednesday, President Obama addressed the United Nations General Assembly, to garner support for his war against the Islamic State of Syria and the Levant (ISIL).

 “There can be no reasoning – no negotiation – with this brand of evil. The only language understood by killers like this is the language of force. So the United States of America will work with a broad coalition to dismantle this network of death.”

Both Bush and Obama vowed that the United States would not be alone, but would instead work closely with a coalition. In the same way Bush used the tactic of fear, and described why Americans should be wary of the Iraqi regime, Obama highlighted the gruesome actions of the Islamic State.

Innocent children have been gunned down. Bodies have been dumped in mass graves. Religious minorities have been starved to death,” said Obama. “In the most horrific crimes imaginable, innocent human beings have been beheaded, with videos of the atrocity distributed to shock the conscience of the world.

Obama also mirrored his predecessor, when he used the phrase “network of death,” which has a similar context to the “axis of evil” used by Bush.

However, a former White House speechwriter, Michael Gerson, who helped to coin Bush’s “axis of evil,” claimed that “When dealing with an ideology that inspires beheadings and mass murder, the English language only offers so many words that carry sufficient moral weight‘Evil’ and ‘death’ are two of them.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_nxouSJq9c]

Breaking: Eric Holder Resigns | Ben Swann Truth In Media

THROW THE BUM OUT!!!  FINALLY!
Breaking: Eric Holder Resigns | Ben Swann Truth In Media.

Breaking: Eric Holder Resigns

By: Ben Swann Sep 25, 2014

5
Washington- Attorney General Eric Holder, the first African-American to hold the nation’s top law enforcement position, plans to announce on Thursday that he will resign the post he’s held for nearly six years as soon as a successor can be confirmed. The announcement was first shared with NPR on Thursday.

Holder, who has been heavily criticized by Republicans in Congress for his role in Operation Fast and Furious, as well as criticisms that his AG Department was deeply involved in racial politics.

The House in June 2012 found Mr. Holder in contempt of Congress in a historic vote weighted with political significance — though it did little to break the stalemate over his decision to withhold documents regarding the Justice Department’s actions in a botched gunwalking operation.The House voted 255-67 to hold Mr. Holder in criminal contempt in a vote that amounted to a political spanking for the attorney general and President Obama, underscored by the 17 Democrats who joined Republicans.

Holder already is one of the longest-serving members of the Obama Cabinet and ranks as the fourth-longest tenured AG in history.

Do you even Liberty bruh? – YouTube

Do you even Liberty bruh? – YouTube.

I am so disappointed in Thom Hartman assessment of Libertarianism!  He is so off the mark I cannot even believe he thinks this way.  He truly is spouting disinformation regarding Libertarianism and this kid “That Guy T” has him on the ropes!  Good for you for dispelling this total crap from someone I no longer consider a journalist but a double speak commentator.  You are sooo off course Thom it is not even funny, it is despicable!

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXRuTDnv4Hc]

France to carry out airstrikes in Iraq

France To Carry Out Airstrikes In Iraq
via France to carry out airstrikes in Iraq.
By GREG KELLER Sep. 18, 2014 3:33 PM EDT

2 photos

French President Francois Hollande delivers his speech during a press conference at the Elysee… Read more

PARIS (AP) — France has agreed to carry out airstrikes requested by Iraq to bolster its fight against the Islamic State group’s fighters who’ve captured swathes of the country, President Francois Hollande said Thursday.

Hollande stressed that France wouldn’t go beyond airstrikes in support of the Iraqi military or Kurdish Peshmerga forces, and wouldn’t attack targets in Syria, where the Islamic State group has also captured territory.

He said he would inform the parliament of the planned action “as soon as the first strikes — that is to say, soon.”

Speaking during his twice-yearly news conference, Hollande said he agreed to Iraq’s request for air support at a meeting of his top defense and security advisers earlier in the day.

“This morning I decided to respond to the request of Iraqi authorities to provide air support,” Hollande said. “We won’t go beyond this. There won’t be troops on the ground. And we will act only in Iraq.”

Following a request by Iraqi authorities, French jets began flying reconnaissance missions over the country Monday, and have so far carried out four using Rafale fighter aircraft and an ATL2 surveillance plane, military spokesman Col. Gilles Jaron said. He provided no further details.

Purely Commentary: Male-On-Male Rape Epidemic in Obama’s Pro-Deviancy Military – BarbWire.com

Male-On-Male Rape Epidemic in Obama’s Pro-Deviancy Military – BarbWire.com.

GayMilitaryObmaa

MALE-ON-MALE RAPE EPIDEMIC IN OBAMA’S PRO-DEVIANCY MILITARY

avatar

on 19 September, 2014 at 09:00

One of the things we predicted when the infamous crime against nature was dropped as a bar to military service was an inevitable descent into moral and sexual debauchery in our armed forces.

And we were right.

Homosexual conduct is immoral, unnatural and unhealthy. There are a host of pathologies associated with male homosexual conduct, including random, promiscuous, anonymous sex, a highly elevated risk of HIV/AIDS and a proclivity toward sexual violence.

This is not a lifestyle any rational society, let alone its military, should embrace or support.

Now we are getting more information about just how twisted and dangerous this lifestyle is.

According to the Daily Mail, a prominent newspaper in the UK, male on male rape in the United States military is reaching epidemic proportions.

Absorb this tragic excerpt:

When a man enters the military he is ten times likelier to be sexually abused, and in 2012 alone there were an estimated 14,200 reports of male rape.

Read that again. A man who enlists in the United States military is ten times more likely to be on the receiving end of sexual abuse than if he remains in the civilian population. The risk of being raped jumps a staggering 1,000 percent.

Our military has become a playground for sexual predators, a veritable smorgasbord of victims for homosexuals on the prowl.

It would be stupendously stupid not to accept the plain fact that, as the public becomes aware of these sordid and tragic realities, recruitment, retention, readiness and morale will plummet.

Here are some excerpts from this article:

In a recent GQ article, more than a dozen veterans and current service men came forward to tell of their sexual assault, and how the military institution failed time and time again to bring their predators to justice or get them the psychiatric help they needed…

Steve Stovey, Navy: ‘As a man, I can’t perform the way I used to. I just feel damaged. All I remember, along with the pain, is the slapping sound of being raped. I try to make love to my wife, but I can’t – I’m triggered. I’m traumatized by that sound.’

This is problematic since men are much less likely to report these incidents, leaving their attackers in positions of power and keeping the pain inside to boil over into other relationships.

The power structure within the military also makes these attacks more prevalent, because men in lower ranks may find it hard to report their attackers if they are superiors.

‘When a gunnery sergeant tells you to take off your clothes, you better take off your clothes. You don’t ask questions,’ former Marine Sam Madrid (name changed) said…

Kole Welsh, Army, 2002 – 2007: ‘I had actually let the assault go, because I didn’t want it to interfere with my career. I wanted to be an officer, and I just said, “Bad experience, won’t let that happen again.” But there was some residual damage. A month and a half later, I was brought into a room with about nine officers and told, “You’ve tested positive [for HIV].” I was removed from the military and signed out within a day. It was a complete shock…’

And when the men aren’t silencing themselves, the military is doing it for them by discharging victims for misdiagnosed personality disorders and letting their attackers continue to serve.

Trent Smith, Air Force, enlisted 2011: ‘He was a senior aide—he had a direct line to the top. Being invited over to his house, I just took it as I should go. Looking back, I ask myself, Why didn’t you do anything? It wasn’t like he held me down or tied me up. I didn’t want to cross him. I really didn’t feel like I had any choice. I had just turned 19. It could be my career. I froze and went along with it.’

Because sodomy is now a most-favored sexual proclivity in President Obama’s military, male victims of rape have no one to tell without placing their military careers in jeopardy.

And they have a vanishingly small chance of getting justice if they do complain. “[T]he military justice system…has only convicted 7 per cent of all MSP cases that go to trial, which is why an estimated 81 percent of victims never even report.”

In other words, in 2012 there were almost certainly more than the 14,200 male-on-male rapes that we know about. Our military has become a cesspool of homosexual degeneracy.

“Meanwhile,” concludes the Daily Mail, “the victims continue to suffer in silence.”

Here’s what GQ says on this subject:

Sexual assault is alarmingly common in the U.S. military, and more than half of the victims are men. According to the Pentagon, thirty-eight military men are sexually assaulted every single day. These are the stories you never hear—because the culprits almost always go free, the survivors rarely speak, and no one in the military or Congress has done enough to stop it.

And according to GQ:

Men develop PTSD from sexual assault at nearly twice the rate they do from combat…Military sexual trauma causes a particularly toxic form of PTSD. The betrayal by a comrade-in-arms, a brother in whom you place unconditional trust, can be unbearable. Warrior culture values stoicism, which encourages a victim to keep his troubles to himself and stigmatizes him if he doesn’t. An implacable chain of command sometimes compels a victim to work or sleep alongside an attacker, which can make him feel captive to his suffering and deserving of it.

A weakened, enervated, morally eviscerated military compromises its ability to do its job and it makes us all less safe.

Bottom line: it is long past time to reinstate the ban against homosexuality in the United States military. Our national security depends upon it.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Activist Post: Doublethink: Media Reports No Military Action Against ISIS While Reporting Airstrikes Against ISIS

Activist Post: Doublethink: Media Reports No Military Action Against ISIS While Reporting Airstrikes Against ISIS.

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Melissa Melton
Activist Post 

Are we at “war” with ISIS?

Nope.


According to our White House, who still cannot even manage to give an 
estimate about how much this…eh… (insert that word for whatever that one thing is called when one nation offensively blows up targets in other sovereign nations) is going to cost over in the Middle East, we’re at anything but a war.

In fact, when White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest was asked that very question back on August 29 — “Is the United States presently at war with ISIS — yes or no?” — he answered a definite “no,” instead claiming,

“What we are doing is we are working very aggressively with international partners, with Iraqi and Kurdish security forces, to take the steps necessary to mitigate the threat that’s posed by ISIL.” (source)

See? Airstriking other countries isn’t war. It’s “mitigating a threat.” Funny, didn’t see that phrase anywhere in the Constitution…so much for checks and balances.
Of course, that was all the way back when the U.S. was only bombing ISIS in Iraq. Now we’re also striking targets in Syria. In fact, reports are coming in that 12 oil refineries — definitely for sure used by ISIS, right? — were blown up in Syria by the U.S. and coalition forces just today.

France is also striking right as reports have come out that one of their countrymen has also been beheaded by ISIS. Is ISIS’ plan to behead one person from each Western nation? Guess that would give more and more Western countries an excuse to join in on bombing Syria as well. Oh, and the UK is about to start striking, too.

But again, this isn’t a war. It’s a “focused campaign” or “military action” of a bunch of countries blowing stuff up in several other countries.
  
Or…is it even military action?

The reason I ask is the government and mainstream media’s glaring inability to fully define what exactly our government is doing in the Middle East right now by blowing up people and places in other countries.

Watch the Fox News clip below from about a week and a half ago. Starting at around the 1:55 mark, you’ll see something a little…odd.

http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2014/09/15/36768/fnc-an-2014-hegsethisis

On one side of the screen, you have the “Fox facts” and the number one “fact” listed is as “U.S. has conducted at least 160 airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq.”

At the same time on the same screen, the lower third asserts, “No military action yet against ISIS, despite coalition to fight terrorists.”

Wha…?  

Oh, and in case you were wondering, there are also absolutely 
no boots on the ground…even as we continue to send more and more “military advisers” over there… who… apparently… Wear flip flops and levitate? 

Congress is also voting 
 once again to spend millions more to arm the supposedly “vetted” moderate rebels in Syria (rebels who, in the past after being funded, armed and trained by the CIA at a base in Jordan went on to join ISIS, the very group we’re now striking), how is anyone even supposed to keep straight who the “good guys” and “bad guys” are in this non-war, non-military action airstriking by the U.S. military?

Via 
Godfather Politics :

Now that the United States is going to “fight” ISIS, the non-Islamic non-state Islamic State in Syria and Iraq plus the Levant plus Cincinnati, by funding the non-moderate, non-rebel moderate rebels in Syria, it’s high time somebody sat down and tried to clarify this whole mess.

Ever since President Obama got the five-iron out of his … ahem … let me try that again. Once President Obama stepped up to his responsibilities and declared we would crush, kill, destroy — whatever verb he used — ISIL/ISIS/IS/non-Islamic non-State, the Administration has been on a positive tear through the thesaurus in trying to find euphemisms to describe what exactly we’re trying to do to whom, without us hearing that we’re doing anything definite to anybody real.

Well, we definitely blew up 12 of Syria’s oil refineries today, so…

What was the definition of George Orwell’s “doublethink” again? Holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s head simultaneously while believing both are true?

Impossible in practice? Ask the White House and the establishment media.

Case in point: go ahead and try to wrap your mind around these 
comments   President Obama made before the United Nations General Assembly earlier today:

The ideology of ISIL or al Qaeda or Boko Haram will wilt and die if it is consistently exposed, confronted, and refuted in the light of day. Look at the new Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies – Sheikh bin Bayyah described its purpose: “We must declare war on war, so the outcome will be peace upon peace.”[emphasis added]

War on war will get us peace upon peace?

So…war is peace.

(If you haven’t figured out by now that we’re living in George Orwell’s 
1984, I’m not sure how much more obvious it will have to get.)
Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared, and a co-creator ofTruthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!


Read more at http://www.activistpost.com/2014/09/doublethink-media-reports-no-military.html#jMeT3etD0cxLh0S5.99

Study: Antidepressants rapidly alter brain architecture

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-antidepressants-brain-structure-20140918-story.htmlAntidepressants
Antidepressants rapidly alter brain architecture
A single dose of SSRI antidepressants such as Fluoxetine, shown here, can change the brain’s functional connectivity within three hours, a new study found. (Joe Raedle / Getty Images)
By GEOFFREY MOHAN contact the reporter Medical ResearchDrug ResearchMental Health ResearchHuman BehaviorScientific Research
No bummer: antidepressants work faster than we think they do, study suggests
Drugs tinker with brain connections within three hours, study of antidepressants says
A single dose of a popular class of psychiatric drug used to treat depression can alter the brain’s architecture within hours, even though most patients usually don’t report improvement for weeks, a new study suggests.
More than 1 in 10 adults in the U.S. use these drugs, which adjust the availability of a chemical transmitter in the brain, serotonin, by blocking the way it is reabsorbed. The so-called Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, or SSRIs, include Prozac, Lexapro, Celexa, Paxil and Zoloft.
————
Related story: To quash depression, some brain cells must push through the stress
Related story: To quash depression, some brain cells must push through the stress
Melissa Healy
FOR THE RECORD: A previous version of this post and a photograph identified Effexor as an SSRI category antidepressant. It is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, or SNRI.
————
The findings could be a first step toward figuring out whether a relatively simple brain scan might one day help psychiatrists distinguish between those who respond to such drugs and those who don’t, an area of mystery and controversy in depression treatment.
Researchers at the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, used a magnetic resonance imaging machine to compare connections in the gray matter of those who took SSRIs and those who did not. They were particularly interested in what goes on when the brain is doing nothing in particular.
lRelated A new fast-acting antidepressant (that’s not ketamine) shows promise
SCIENCE NOW
A new fast-acting antidepressant (that’s not ketamine) shows promise
SEE ALL RELATED
8
“We just tell them to let their minds wander and not think of anything particularly dramatic or upsetting,” said neuroscientist Dr. Julia Sacher, a co-author of the study published online Thursday in the journal Current Biology.
They created 3-D maps of connections that “matter” to gray matter: interdependence, not just anatomical connection. They relied on a discovery in the late 1990s that low-frequency brain signaling during relative inactivity, such as daydreaming, is a good indicator of functional connectivity.
In a perfect world, you would look not only at SSRIs, but all sorts of medications and non-pharmacological interventions.
– Julia Sacher, psychiatrist and neuroscientist, Max Planck Institute
When more serotonin was available, this resting state functional connectivity decreased on a broad scale, the study found. This finding was not particularly surprising — other studies have shown a similar effect in brain regions strongly associated with mood regulation.
But there was a two-fold shock: Some areas of the brain appeared to buck the trend and become more interdependent. And all the changes were evident only three hours after the single dosage.
“It was interesting to see two patterns that seemed to go in the opposite direction,” Sacher said. “What was really surprising was that the entire brain would light up after only three hours. We didn’t expect that.”
Most people who use antidepressants don’t report any discernible change in mood for at least two weeks, said Sacher, who also is a psychiatrist.
The rapid connectivity shifts noted by the study might therefore be precursors to longer-term changes, perhaps starting with remodeling of synapses, the microscopic gaps where chemical neurotransmitters such as serotonin flood across to an adjacent brain cell, the study suggests. But this type of brain scanning can’t pick up changes at such a scale, so the hypothesis will have to be tested other ways, Sacher added.
Related story: Antidepressants and self-harm: For those under 24, initial dose matters
Related story: Antidepressants and self-harm: For those under 24, initial dose matters
Melissa Healy
More research also will be needed to explain why the functional connectivity of the cerebellum and thalamus apparently increased. The cerebellum, or “little brain” is a relatively primitive structure that processes signals from the spinal cord, relaying them to the thalamus and on up to the cortex. Many of those pathways are regulated by serotonin.
Although the cerebellum is associated mostly with such basic functions as motor control and coordination, there are hints that it plays a role in higher cognitive tasks, perhaps by changing the way the thalamus relays signals to the cortex.
Although many open hypotheses remain to be explored, the brain maps produced by the study advance the effort to identify a brain “fingerprint” for those who might respond to SSRI therapy, researchers said.
Study subjects did not have diagnoses of depression, so researchers will need to generate similar maps among those diagnosed with depression, and re-map them during and after depressive episodes, as well as after treatment, Sacher said. Comparisons might then show whether a certain initial architecture predicts treatment success.
“In a perfect world, you would look not only at SSRIs, but all sorts of medications and non-pharmacological interventions,” Sacher said. “That would really help to tailor individual therapy for someone in the midst of a depressive episode.”
Sacher said she prescribes SSRI drugs for patients. The study, however, did not receive funds from pharmaceutical companies, she added.
Twitter: @LATsciguy

U.N.: Wrongly mixed vaccine kills 15 infants

 

(CNN) — A crying mother cradles and moves her dead baby to the floor, yelling out, “My child, my child.” Outside, another woman shakes and gestures in a fit of absolute grief as she piercingly screams, “Pray to God and his prophet sister.”

Both women had brought their children to a clinic in a rebel-held part of northwestern Syria, hoping to help save their lives. Instead, at least 15 children — all under the age of 2 — died after receiving measles vaccinations through a U.N.-sponsored program.

As many as 50 other children got sick after what a U.N. report described as a “bungled immunization.”

U.N.: Wrongly mixed vaccine kills 15 infants
-NO AUTHOR-
Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:23:13 GMT

Airline Captain Eloquently Tells A Story You Don't Want To Miss!!!

Airline Captain Speaks!!!

My lead flight attendant came to me and said,

“We have an H.R. on this flight.”

(H.R. stands for Human Remains.) 

“Are they military?” I asked.  

‘Yes’, she said.  

‘Is there an escort?’ I asked.

 ‘Yes, I’ve already assigned him a seat’.  

‘Would you please tell him to come to the Flight Deck. You can board him early,” I said…  

A short while later a young army sergeant entered the flight deck.  He was the image of the perfectly dressed soldier.  He introduced himself and I asked him about his soldier. 

The escorts of these fallen soldiers talk about them as if they are still alive and still with us.  ‘My soldier is on his way back to Virginia,’ he said.  He proceeded to answer my questions, but offered no words. 

I asked him if there was anything I could do for him and he said no.  I told him that he had the toughest job in the military, and that I appreciated the work that he does for the families of our fallen soldiers. The first officer and I got up out of our seats to shake his hand.  He left the Flight Deck to find his seat. 

We completed our preflight checks, pushed back and performed an uneventful departure.

About 30 minutes into our flight, I received a call from the lead flight attendant in the cabin.  

‘I just found out the family of the soldier we are carrying, is also on board’, she said.  She then

proceeded to tell me that the father, mother, wife and 2-year old daughter were escorting their

son, husband, and father home.  The family was upset because they were unable to see the

container that the soldier was in before we left.  

We were on our way to a major hub at which the family was going to wait four hours for the connecting

flight home to Virginia .  The father of the soldier told the flight attendant that knowing his son was

below him in the cargo compartment and being unable to see him was too much for him and the

family to bear.  He had asked the flight attendant if there was anything that could be done to allow

them to see him upon our arrival. The family wanted to be outside by the cargo door to watch

the soldier being taken off the airplane.  

I could hear the desperation in the flight attendant’s voice when she asked me if there

was anything I could do. ‘I’m on it’, I said. I told her that I would get back to her.  

Airborne communication with my company normally occurs in the form of e-mail like messages.

I decided to bypass this system and contact my flight dispatcher directly on a secondary radio.

There is a radio operator in the operations control center who connects you to the telephone of the dispatcher. I was in direct contact with the dispatcher.  I explained the situation I had on board

with the family and what it was the family wanted.  He said he understood and that he

would get back to me.  

Two hours went by and I had not heard from the dispatcher.  We were going to get busy

soon and I needed to know what to tell the family.  I sent a text message asking for an update.

I saved the return message from the dispatcher and the following is the text:  

‘Captain, sorry it has taken so long to get back to you.  There is policy on this now, and I had

to check on a few things.  Upon your arrival, a dedicated escort team will meet the aircraft.

The team will escort the family to the ramp and plane side.  A van will be used to load the

remains with a secondary van for the family.  

The family will be taken to their departure area and escorted into the terminal, where the

remains can be seen on the ramp.  It is a private area for the family only.  When the

connecting aircraft arrives, the family will be escorted onto the ramp and plane side to

watch the remains being loaded for the final leg home.  

Captain, most of us here in flight control are veterans.  Please pass our condolences

on to the family.  Thanks.

 I sent a message back, telling flight control thanks for a good job.  I printed out the message

and gave it to the lead flight attendant to pass on to the father.  The lead flight attendant was

very thankful and told me, ‘You have no idea how much this will mean to them.’  

Things started getting busy for the descent, approach and landing.   After landing, we cleared

the runway and taxied to the ramp area.  The ramp is huge with 15 gates on either side of the

alleyway.  It is always a busy area with aircraft maneuvering every which way to enter and exit.

When we entered the ramp and checked in with the ramp controller, we were told that all traffic

was being held for us.  

‘There is a team in place to meet the aircraft’, we were told.  It looked like it was all coming

together, then I realized that once we turned the seat belt sign off, everyone would stand

up at once and delay the family from getting off the airplane.  As we approached our gate,

I asked the copilot to tell the ramp controller, we were going to stop short of the gate to

make an announcement to the passengers.  He did that and the ramp controller said,

‘Take your time.’  

I stopped the aircraft and set the parking brake.  I pushed the public address button and said:

‘Ladies and gentleman, this is your Captain speaking: I have stopped short of our gate to make

a special announcement.  We have a passenger on board who deserves our honor and respect.

His Name is Private XXXXXX, a soldier who recently lost his life.  Private XXXXXX is under your

feet in the cargo hold.  Escorting him today is Army Sergeant XXXXXXX.  Also, on board are

his father, mother, wife, and daughter.  Your entire flight crew is asking for all passengers to

remain in their seats to allow the family to exit the aircraft first.  Thank you.’  

We continued the turn to the gate, came to a stop and started our shutdown procedures.

A couple of minutes later I opened the cockpit door.  I found the two forward flight attendants

crying, something you just do not see.  I was told that after we came to a stop, every passenger

on the aircraft stayed in their seats, waiting for the family to exit the aircraft.  

When the family got up and gathered their things, a passenger slowly started to clap his hands.

Moments later, more passengers joined in and soon the entire aircraft was clapping.

Words of ‘God Bless You’, I’m sorry, thank you, be proud, and other kind words were uttered

to the family as they made their way down the aisle and out of the airplane.  They were escorted

down to the ramp to finally be with their loved one.  

Many of the passengers disembarking thanked me for the announcement I had made.

They were just words, I told them, I could say them over and over again, but nothing I say

will bring back that brave soldier.  

I respectfully ask that all of you reflect on this event and the sacrifices that millions of our men

and women have made to ensure our freedom and safety in theseUnited States of AMERICA. 

 

 Foot note:  I know everyone who reads this will have tears in their eyes, including me.  Prayer chain for our Military… Don’t break it!  Please send this on after a short prayer for our service men and women.  Don’t break it!  They die for me and mine and you and yours and deserve our honor and respect. 

AND THEN:::::::::

U S  Army Major General Harold Greene was buried at Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors, including a caisson, two escort platoons, casket team, firing party, colors team, and a caparisoned horse.   The U.S. Army band, “Pershing’s Own,” played softly as the funeral procession made its way down the long hill past the rows of simple white gravestones to bring General Greene to his final resting place.
 The graveside service began with a few words, followed by a 13-gun salute.  The major general’s widow, Dr. Susan Myers, was seated in the front row.   To her right was their son 1st Lt. Matthew Greene, his daughter Amelia Greene, followed by Major General Greene’s father, also Harold Greene.
 After three rifle volleys and the playing of “Taps,” the American flag, once placed on the major general’s casket, was carefully folded as the band played “America the Beautiful.”   U S Army Chief of Staff General Ray Odierno presented the flag to his widow, and additional flags to his children and father.
 General Greene, 55, became the highest-ranking fatality in the war in Afghanistan after an Afghan military police officer opened fire on August 5, 2014.
 Among the missing at the service were……
No
President
No
Vice President
No
Secretary of State
No
Secretary of Defense
 In all fairness, President Barack Hussein Obama was unable to attend because of a conflict with his Tee Time…….
 From the Prairies of the Dakotas:  While a Military Daughter Buries Her 2-Star General Daddy, the Commander-in-Least is Nowhere to Be Found.   When two-star Major General Harold Greene, the highest-ranking officer killed in combat since Vietnam, was laid to rest in Arlington National Cemetery on Thursday, neither the President nor the Vice President were present.   The nominal Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama was playing a round at the Vineyard Golf Club with Valerie Jarrett’s cousin, Cyrus Walker, the World Bank president and former President of Dartmouth College Jim Kim, and former lobbyist and ambassador Ron Kirk.  The clownish Joe Biden was in the middle of the third day of a week long vacation in the Hamptons, which followed a week in Wyoming, which was preceded by a week at Rehoboth Beach in Delaware. 
While America has lost a two-star General who has served in a war the president has waged questionably, the Commander-in-Chief could not show the common decency to honor him with his presence.  Instead, President Obama showed it was more important to play yet another round with well-connected elites, as the nation grieves and families suffer. The disconnect could not be more profound.
 YET THREE OF OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATION REPS WERE SENT TO FERGUSON, MO.  FOR THE FUNERAL OF A BLACK TEEN.  continuing the game of “Suck Up” to his constituency…
If you read this far, here’s a thought:
If the democratic party continues to hold the senate after next January, it is likely that el presidente will get to nominate a new justice for SCOTUS — a life-time appointment. If bader-ginsburg is replaced, it will be somewhat of a wash insofar as doctrine is concerned but there’s still the issue of extension and, as I understand it, a justice does not  have to be a licensed attorney….anybody will do. Consider justice eric holder or  justice michelle obama for openers. Feel free to add your candidates to the list..However,should the 5-4 situation be changed to 4-5, The Constitution effectively goes out the window, with the Bill of Rights.
 
 
 

Senate blocks campaign finance amendment – POLITICO.com

“The proposed amendment would restrict the most important speech the First Amendment protects, core political speech,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Wednesday. “It’s hard to imagine what would be more radical than the Congress passing a constitutional amendment to overturn a dozen Supreme Court decisions that have protected individual rights. Free speech would be dramatically curtailed.”
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/senate-block-campaign-finance-amendment-110864.html