Category Archives: Land of the Free | Perspective

Activist Post: Industry’s Own Words: 6 Admissions Of In-Home Surveillance Using Smart Meters

Activist Post: Industry’s Own Words: 6 Admissions Of In-Home Surveillance Using Smart Meters.

Industry’s Own Words: 6 Admissions Of In-Home Surveillance Using Smart Meters

Josh del Sol Activist Post
A look at what utility companies, PUCs, and the former CIA director have to say about the ‘smart’ meters, data-mining, and surveillance — sans propaganda. It’s always a drag to find out when a friend is saying one thing to your face, and another to your back. As uncovered in our film Take Back Your Power, the way in which most utilities are now delivering the lies and propaganda — with your individual rights, security, and potentially health on the line — is elevating the trait of “two-faced” to a completely new level. It’s important to note that the first 4 of these references have to do with the smart meters / grid infrastructure capabilities as of this time. According to the sum of my research over the past 3 years, the plan involves achieving a greater and greater level of granularity and extraction of in-home data over time — see #5 and #6 below as examples (as well as my article on Google’s Nest acquisition). So as far as privacy and surveillance go, according to utilities’ own documentation and writings, ‘smart’ meters are effectively a trojan horse. 1) US Congressional Research Service report, “Smart Meter Data: Privacy and Cybersecurity” (February 2012)

With smart meters, police will have access to data that might be used to track residents’ daily lives and routines while in their homes, including their eating, sleeping, and showering habits, what appliances they use and when, and whether they prefer the television to the treadmill, among a host of other details.

Source: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42338.pdf – see page 7 (page 10 of the PDF)

2) Colorado Power Utility Commission report, “Smart Metering & Privacy: Existing Law and Competing Policies” (Spring 2009)

First, the privacy concerns are real, and should be addressed proactively in order to protect consumers. Second and related, a salient privacy invasion—were it to happen and get press—could create significant opposition to smart grid deployment efforts.

Source: http://www.dora.state.co.us/puc/DocketsDecisions/DocketFilings/09I-593EG/09I-593EG_Spring2009Report-SmartGridPrivacy.pdf – see page 6

3) California Public Utility Commission press release, “California Commission Adopts Rules to Protect the Privacy and Security of Customer Electricity Usage Data” (July 2011)

Our action today will protect the privacy and security of customer usage data while enablingutilities and authorized third-parties to use the information to provide useful energy management and conservation services to customers.

I support today’s decision because it adopts reasonable privacy and security rules and expandsconsumer and third-party access to electricity usage and pricing information. I hope this decision stimulates market interest.

Source:http://smartenergyportal.net/article/california-commission-adopts-rules-protect-privacy-and-security-customer-electricity-usage-d

4) SF Chronicle article, “California Utilities Yield Energy Use Data” (July 2013)

California’s electric utilities last year disclosed the energy-use records and other personal information of thousands of customers, according to reports the companies filed with state regulators.

The vast majority of those disclosures – 4,062 – were made by one utility, San Diego Gas and Electric Co. In 4,000 of those cases, the information was subpoenaed by government agencies.

New digital smart meters being installed throughout the state can measure a home’s energy use hour by hour, showing when residents leave for work, go to sleep or travel on vacation. Older analog meters, which measured cumulative energy use over the course of a month, couldn’t do that.

“Before smart meters, what happened inside houses couldn’t be revealed unless there was a police officer inside with a warrant,” Ozer said.

Source: http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Calif-utilities-yield-energy-use-data-4611159.php

5) Raab & Associates, Steering Committee report (February 2013) – Under the heading “Strategic (3-10 years)”:

New tools for mining data for intel

Under the heading “Transformational (10+ years)”:

Centralized intel combined with widespread local/distributed intel

and

Data mining and analytics becomes core competency

Source: http://magrid.raabassociates.org/articles/raab%20subcommittee%20update%20draft.ppt

View slide 17 only (PDF): http://www.takebackyourpower.net/documents/RaabDraft-17.pdf

6) Wired.com, “CIA Chief: We’ll Spy on You Through Your Dishwasher” (15 Mar 2012)

‘Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters — all connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing,’ Petraeus said, ‘the latter now going to cloud computing, in many areas greater and greater supercomputing, and, ultimately, heading to quantum computing.

“Petraeus allowed that these household spy devices “change our notions of secrecy” and prompt a rethink of “our notions of identity and secrecy.” All of which is true — if convenient for a CIA director.”

Source: http://www.wired.com/2012/03/petraeus-tv-remote/

* * * Did we really think that the technocratic oligarchy would stop at collecting information about how we use our phones, who we call, and where we’re located? If we did, we were naive. Plainly, there is a corporate intention to effectively colonize your home. However, there is also a rising awareness, and resistance, as new solutions are uncovered. The first step is to remove your consent, in writing. The following is actually written into the California Civil Code. Not only do these provide a strong clue at how the corporatocracy functions (and gets away with what it does), but they also outline a basis for remedy: (notes in parentheses, italics)

California Civil Code (2009)

1619. A contract is either express or implied. (If you didn’t say no, you said yes.) 

3515. He who consents to an act is not wronged by it. (The way they do business is in writing. If you didn’t send them a letter or notice to remove your consent, you have agreed to their terms, and thus have agreed to a reduction in rights.)

3521. He who takes the benefit must bear the burden. (Utilities and their executives – and many public servants – are taking the benefit. They must, according to their law, accept the liability for all harm if the liability is enforced.) 

3523. For every wrong there is a remedy. (We are not bound into something which would have us be as slaves, if we do not want to be.) 

3527. The law helps the vigilant, before those who sleep on their rights.

What statutes are YOUR utilities and governments bound by? Stay tuned, watch and share Take Back Your Power, and subscribe your email on our website to be informed of important developments and solutions. [youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDMYc1qlhFY] Related articles by Josh del Sol:

Josh del Sol is the director and producer of Take Back Your Power, a revelatory documentary feature film uncovering the worldwide ‘smart’ metering and grid agenda. Watch the film and subscribe to updates at www.takebackyourpower.net, and follow him via twitter @TBYPfilm.

Report: Research Facility "Loses" Thousands of Tubes Containing Deadly Virus

Report: Research Facility “Loses” Thousands of Tubes Containing Deadly Virus.

virus-vial-main

A French research institute working on various deadly viruses, including SARS, has apparently misplaced thousands of tubes and no one is quite sure where they went.

A routine inventory check at Paris’ Pasteur Institute revealed that 2,349 tubes containing fragments of the virus responsible for the deaths of 774 people in 2002 were missing, the centre named after French chemist Louis Pasteur said.

It is not clear how the tubes disappeared from one of the institute’s safest laboratories. Management were made aware of the loss in January, Le Monde newspaper reported.
For weeks, staff at the institute tried to find the missing vials, general director Christian Bréchot said.
“We’ve looked for those boxes [containing the tubes] everywhere,” Bréchot explained.
“We went thought the lists of all the people who have worked here in the past year and a half, including trainees. We have scrutinised their profile to check if there was any conflict.”
Bréchot said that foul play was “highly improbable” but had not been ruled out.

Though it’s not clear how, investigators have pretty much ruled out foul play. But keep in mind that we’re talking about a deadly virus that has been removed from what should be a highly secured area.  Moreover, no one seems to know when the virus was actually taken.
According to the Pasteur Institute, however, there is no immediate danger because the virus in the vials won’t spread the disease:

The institute was quick to reassure the public and said that the contents of the missing vials had no infectious potential. They contained only part of the virus and had no ability to spread.
“Independent experts referred by health authorities have qualified such potential as ‘non-existing’ according to the available evidence and literature on the survival of the Sars virus,” the institute said.

When dealing with deadly viruses, it is always a good idea to secure your facility, which makes this particular disappearance alarming.

Although the fragments are not dangerous, they do raise concerns by revealing the lab’s vulnerability, said Dr. William Schaffner, chair of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tenn.
“It’s actually not in itself so scary but you wonder about the procedures in that laboratory,” said Schaffner, who is also a former president of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. “Could that lab and perhaps others actually misplace vials that have the complete virus so that it might escape?”

For all we know, the vials disappeared months ago, which brings up the possibility that other infectious disease tubes may have also disappeared.
Apparently, security at these high level research facilities is not up to par. Last year a vial of Guanarito bio-terror agent capable of being used in a “contagion attack” disappeared from a Galveston, TX facility. The incident was voluntarily disclosed to the public but the lost tube has yet to be located.
What’s scary is that, even though such events must be reported to the CDC by law, the public really has no way of knowing whether a deadly agent has been compromised, giving ample time for such a virus to spread should it be released as a weapon.
Moreover, we now have government facilities being built in and around population centers such as the Bio Safety Level 4 facility centrally located in Kansas.
In the wrong hands, one of these agents could easily be used to attack an entire population – and given the “security” of these facilities it may not be so hard to acquire one. And once they have it, it’s as simple as releasing it in a major airport, sitting back, and watching the infection spread and kill off thousands, or perhaps millions of people.
Related: Pandemic Preparedness

FIRE THIS TRAITOR » Eric Holder Plays Race Card As Obama Admin. Collapses Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Eric Holder Plays Race Card As Obama Admin. Collapses
 
Political scandals present dangerous opportunity for false flag to save Obama
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 11, 2014
In a calculated effort to test the historical and political amnesia of the American public and simultaneously play a frayed race card, Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, has decried his treatment at the hands of a House Judiciary Committee hearing earlier in the week.
MSNBC frames the meme: it’s all about race.
The Obama administration continually plays the race card when confronted with political opposition and accusations of impropriety.
Holder asked “what attorney general has had to deal with that kind of treatment?” following a pointed exchange with Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican.
“I realize that contempt is not a big deal to our attorney general, but it is important that we have proper oversight,” Gohmert remarked as Holder weathered questions about the Justice Department’s stonewalling of handing over documents related to the prosecution of a Texas-based Islamic charity.
Although not specifically stated, Holder accused Gohmert and the Republicans of picking on him due to the color of his skin. This was underscored by the fact he complained about his treatment while attending Al Sharpton’s National Action Network.
In fact, a large number of federal government bureaucrats, including former Attorney General Janet Reno, have weathered contempt of Congress charges with far less theatrics.
Since 1975, these have included a Secretary of State; a Secretary of Commerce; a Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare; a couple Secretaries of Energy; a Secretary of the Interior; various officials of the EPA; a White House Counsel and a White House Chief of Staff. On Thursday, the House Oversight Committee added to this list of ignobility by voting to hold former IRS Director of Tax Exempt Organizations Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress.
In 1975, Nixon’s former Attorney General, John Mitchell, endured a far worse fate than Eric Holder ever will – he was sentenced to two and a half to eight years in prison for his role in the Watergate break-in and cover-up. Mitchell’s sentence was subsequently reduced and he served 19 months before he was released on parole for medical reasons.
Mitchell’s crimes of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury, however, pale in comparison to Eric Holder’s criminal complicity at the Justice Department. Florida Republican Rep. Allen West and others have pointed to Holder’s attempt to subvert a congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious and Project Gunrunner. Fast and Furious led to a number of murders.
Holder’s tiff while questioned before the House Judiciary Committee amply demonstrates the continued collapse of the Obama administration – from Obama’s willful violations of the Constitution to an extraordinary number of scandals from Fast and Furious to the IRS political hit squad – and it also demonstrates the threat such an unprecedented crash and burn represents.
Exposure of this level of political and criminal corruption may ultimately set the stage for a false flag event engineered not only to save Obama, but his global elite puppet masters as well.
This article was posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 at 12:14 pm
via » Eric Holder Plays Race Card As Obama Admin. Collapses Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!.

THANK GOD HE IS FORMER JUSTICE!!! ANOTHER TRAITOR!! » Former Justice Stevens Wants the Second Amendment Edited Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Former Justice Stevens Wants the Second Amendment Edited
 
Gut the Second Amendment and turn the individual’s natural right to self defense into a crime
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 11, 2014
Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Retired associate Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens has an op-ed in The Washington Post today calling for the Second Amendment to be edited thus:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.
According to Stevens, the “national tragedy” of the shootings at Newtown and the Navy Yard in Washington make it necessary to gut the Second Amendment and turn the individual’s natural right to self defense into a crime.
Stevens insists Second Amendment advocates are emotional and distort “intelligent debate about the wisdom of particular aspects of proposed legislation designed to minimize the slaughter caused by the prevalence of guns in private hands. Those emotional arguments would be nullified by the adoption of my proposed amendment.”
Also nullified would be the right to own firearms. If adopted, which is admittedly unlikely, government would quickly enact a raft of laws spelling out confiscation. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s edict that Mr. and Mrs. America “turn ‘em all in” or face prosecution would become a reality and, in a worse case scenario, those refusing to obey the government would be hunted down and executed.
Liberals like Mr. Stevens want a throughly disarmed public. It is the liberal’s emotional and irrational response to the destructive behavior of a few psychotic individuals that threatens the natural right of self-defense.
If Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union had not outlawed private ownership of firearms, the imposition of authoritarianism in those countries would have been virtually impossible, as would have been the genocide of tens of millions of Armenians, Jews, Gypsies, Maya Indians, Christians, and all sorts of government designated political enemies and rivals.
Stevens and the Second Amendment haters would enable government to do what it invariably does when given absolute and unchallenged power – violently eliminate all political enemies.
As the sociologist Max Weber pointed out nearly a hundred years ago – before the unprecedented mass murders by government that would be the shameful hallmark of the 20th century – the state invariably claims a monopoly on the use of physical force and violence. It will unhesitatingly use that monopoly against all threats, no matter how trivial or ineffectual, to its absolute control.
This article was posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 at 2:22 pm
via » Former Justice Stevens Wants the Second Amendment Edited Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!.

» ​US Corn Exports to China Drop 85 Percent After Ban on GMO Strains – Industry Report Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Photo by Vmcreddy, Wikimedia Commons
China’s rejection of shipments of US corn containing traces of unapproved genetically modified maize has caused a significant drop in exports. According to a new report, US traders have lost $427 million in sales.
Photo by Vmcreddy, Wikimedia Commons
via » ​US Corn Exports to China Drop 85 Percent After Ban on GMO Strains – Industry Report Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!.

SurveyResults for the job Obama's not doing

http://www.newsmax.com/m/Surveys/Results/id/97/

Overall, do you approve or disapprove of President Obama‘s job performance?


Approve
282,055(19%)
Disapprove
1,136,154(80%)
Compared to previous presidents, how would you rate President Obama?


Average
53,658(3%)
Better than most
249,154(17%)
Worse than most
1,117,710(78%)
Do you approve of his job handling the U.S. economy?


Approve
279,921(19%)
Disapprove
1,132,144(80%)
Do you believe President Obama’s new healthcare law, known as Obamacare, has helped or hurt you?


Helped me
177,279(12%)
Hurt me
953,477(67%)
No difference
286,807(20%)
Do you trust President Obama?


Yes, I trust him
280,904(19%)
No, I do not trust him
1,133,487(80%)

Obama brother works with ‘Koresh-style’ cult leader

WND reported Ebeid has filed a criminal complaint against Malik Obama with Egyptian Attorney General Hisham Barakat, charging that Obama should be placed on Egypt’s terror watch list. Ebeid charges Malik was responsible for managing money for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which is designated by the Egyptian government as a terrorist organization. Also cited is Malik’s involvement as an owner and investment adviser for the Sudan-based Islamic Dawa Organization, or IDO, a group Ebeid has linked with terrorist activities associated with Sudan President Omar Al-Bashir.
via Obama brother works with ‘Koresh-style’ cult leader.

» Judge Napolitano: Ranch Rebellion Was Americans’ “Line in the Sand” Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Judge Napolitano: Ranch Rebellion Was Americans’ “Line in the Sand”
 
BLM feds should have been arrested for theft of private property
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
April 14, 2014
Judge Andrew Napolitano appeared on Fox News to denounce the federal government’s operation against Nevada cattle rancher Cliven Bundy, asserting that BLM agents should have been arrested for seizing his property and that the case represents a “line in the sand” for Americans who have had enough of big government tyranny.
Napolitano said the feds were forced to back down because they had suffered a public relations nightmare, pointing out that Bundy lost his case in a federal court but that the case should have been tried in a state court.
“The federal judiciary should not be deciding what land the federal government owns,” said Napolitano, adding that the feds should have placed a lien against Bundy’s property to collect grazing fees and not conducted a raid backed up by armed agents to seize his private property.
“The government’s option is to take the amount of money he owes them and docket it, that is file the lien on his property….the federal government could have done that, instead they wanted this show of force,” said Napolitano, adding, “They swooped in….with assault rifles aimed and ready and stole this guy’s property, they stole his cattle, they didn’t have the right to do that, that’s theft and they should have been arrested by state officials”.
Napolitano also chastised the BLM’s ludicrous creation of a ‘First Amendment Area’ outside of which free speech was banned. Protesters completely ignored the zone and it was quickly torn down by BLM officials after being widely derided in the media.
“They established something utterly repellant in America, a First Amendment Zone….the square was three miles away from where these events were going – this is the federal government emasculating the First Amendment rights of the protesters,” said the judge.
Napolitano characterized the resistance shown by Bundy supporters as a clear example of how Americans feel, “enough is enough with the federal government, we’re drawing a line in the sand right here – and it drew people from all around the country who basically said ‘quit your heavy handed theft of property and act like you’re a normal litigant and not God almighty’.”
As we reported on Saturday, around 380 cattle were eventually released by BLM agents who then left the scene after a confrontation with hundreds of Bundy supporters who refused to back down despite facing threats that they would be shot dead.
However, the BLM has still vowed to pursue Bundy legally for the $1 million dollar grazing rights fee they claim he owes. Bundy asserts the land in question has been in his family for generations and has said he will only pay the fee to Clark County and not the feds.
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Monday, April 14, 2014 at 3:39 pm
Tags: government corruption
via » Judge Napolitano: Ranch Rebellion Was Americans’ “Line in the Sand” Alex Jones’ Infowars: There’s a war on for your mind!.

Ron Paul’s Reaction to the Standoff in Nevada with Federal Officials | Ron Paul Channel

 

Ron Paul’s Reaction to the Standoff in Nevada with Federal Officials | Ron Paul Channel.

April 14, 2014 – I’ve had a lot of questions asked of me about the episode out in Nevada. I was happy to hear about the federal officials backing off because I was concerned that violence might break out. In many ways, the people spoke out after determining that the federal government had overstepped itself and fortunately their presence did not result in violence. However, I worry about whether or not this is all over because you have the sort of on-again, off-again situation like that of Waco which, of course, ended in violence. I’m hoping that the federal officials don’t come back determined to use violence to remove this family from this house and this land.

This is a typical example of when everyone owns a piece of land and no one does all at the same time. They sort of have an agreement – a lease – where they have been raising cattle on this land for 130 years then all of sudden the rules change. This type of problem wouldn’t happen in Texas because all the land is owned privately. Its makes the point that no one really knows who is in charge. It makes the point that state and private ownership would have prevented this type of problem.

There’s two things that come out of this: one, when the American people speak out, their voices can be heard and can effect what government is doing. Two, it empathizes the value of privateproperty and ownership rather than having collective ownership by a government.

As much as I’d like to see this as a victory for the people, I’m afraid the government has more guns, more power and more determination to express their authoritarianism. They will be back and that means a confrontation between the people and those in our government undermining our liberties – the confrontation will continue.

Editorial note: Dr. Paul’s statement was given via phone to an RPC staffer and subsequently transcribed. Continue to check in with RonPaulChannel.com for more on this developing story.